« Sprinklers recall: last call on O-ring sprinklers replacement | Main | CPSC recalls more lead-laden toys and jewelry »

August 22, 2007

Britax recalls child safety seat for design defect

Letters are in the mail to registered owners of the Britax Decathlon child safety seat to alert consumersCarseat2 that a safety recall is underway for models built between Feb. 12, 2005 and July 31, 2007. At issue is a defect that allows the adjuster to pop out of position under certain circumstances. The letter to owners includes rivet fasteners to keep the adjuster in position.

The recall, conducted in concert with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), involves 121,109 units of model E9L47. Britax has gotten complaints from parents that the adjuster housing popped out of position when they were adjusting the harness. (The adjuster is used to tighten the harness around the child.) No deaths or injuries have been reported.

According to the notice, in certain circumstances the adjuster may move out of position making it difficult for caregivers to properly adjust the harness. Because of this, Britax is sending owners two rivet fasteners (plus an extra) that will secure the adjuster to the child restraint. Britax has set up a Web site for the recall, www.decathlonrecall.com, and is also featuring an instruction video on its site www.britaxusa.com.

Owners of the car seat who did not send in the registration card can call 800-683-2045 or register online at www.britaxusa.com. Even owners of the seat who have not experienced problems are strongly advised to make the repair.

Note: Consumer Reports listed the Britax Decathlon as an appropriate seat for obese children according to the manufacturer's specifications.

Comments

I would like to know how is it that the holes to accept the rivets just happened to already be there on the original child seat? It must be either 1) Britax decided not to install the rivets to save assembly costs, 2) the rivets were preinstalled for sale in other countries with tougher standards, or 3) rivet installation were accidentally overlooked during assembly. Which was it, or is there another explanation? Thanks.

Post a comment

All comments are reviewed by our moderators, and will not appear on this blog unless they have been approved. Comments that do not relate directly to the blog entry's contents, are commercial in nature, contain objectionable or inappropriate material, or otherwise violate our User Agreement or Privacy Policy, will not be approved. Approved posts generally appear within 24 hours of receipt. For general inquiries not related to this blog, please contact Customer Service.

About this blog

Consumer Reports' safety reporters, editors, and testers will quickly report on new developments and trends.
- Report a product safety problem
- Latest recalls from recalls.gov

Consumer Reports on Safety Categories

-    Appliances
-    Autos
-    Babies & Kids
-    Current Affairs
-    Drugs & Medical Safety
-    Electronics
-    Fire
-    Food
-    Food and Drink
-    Games
-    Holidays
-    Household Cleaners
-    Latest Recalls
-    Laws and Government Agencies
-    Lead
-    Music
-    Outdoor Products
-    Poisoning
-    Recalls
-    Safety Crusaders
-    Sports and Recreation
-    Television
-    Tips and How-Tos
-    Toys
-    Water Safety
-    Web/Tech
-    Weblogs

Consumer Reports on Safety Archives

-    July 2009
-    June 2009
-    May 2009
-    April 2009
»    View All