Getting out that damned spot with new iPhone app from Tide

Now there's an iPhone/iPod Touch app for just about every stain.

The new Tide Stain Brain app from Proctor & Gamble, one of the latest home-related iPhone/iPodTouch applications, allows you to find and share stain-fighting solutions for all kinds of messes. If you don't have an iPhone or iPod Touch, you can access the information on the Tide Web site.

No surprise, but the free app takes every opportunity to push Tide laundry products. For example, the first action recommended for common stains like chocolate, dirt, and grass is to "Try Tide Stain Release. Just add it to your wash along with your regular detergent." But other advice is more generic, plus the app and Web interfaces allow you to vote on the stain-fighting solution. For instance, as of late last week, 54 users gave Tide's blood-removal treatment a thumbs down, compared with 35 who approved. You can also submit your own remedies.

No matter the source of the mess, use these general stain-fighting tips:

Act fast. Quick treatment is often the key to stain removal.

Blot, don't scrub. Scrubbing can damage fabrics. Instead, blot with a paper towel or clean cloth. Gently scrape semisolid fabrics with the edge of rounded spoon.

Do a colorfastness test. When using a recommended cleaning agent, always pretest it in an inconspicuous area, such as the back of a tie or an inside seam.

Be patient. It could takes several passes to remove a stain. Always start with the mildest option before moving on to more-aggressive cleaning agents.—Daniel DiClerico | e-mail | Twitter | Forums | Facebook

Essential information: Read our specific tips for tackling common holiday stains, including wine, lipstick, and candle wax. And to see how Tide laundry products perform, read our latest report on laundry detergents (ratings available to subscribers).

Weekend Project: The best ways to deal with leaves

Whether your yard is covered with leaves or you're still waiting for them to carpet your property, you're probably looking for the easiest, most-effective way to deal with fall cleanup. As you'll see in The Great Rake-Off: Man vs. Machine video, using a leaf blower can provide faster, more-efficient leaf-wrangling than raking.

To help you find the right leaf blower for your needs, check out our free buyer's guide and watch our new video buyer's guide to this outdoor power equipment (right), which details the pros and cons of the four major blower types and the features to look for.

Corded electric models have their upsides—they tend to be lighter and quieter than gas-powered models and don't produce emissions at the point of use their own—and the best electric blowers can rival gas machines in performance. But as Senior Ed Perratore knows all too well, the power cord can limit your mobility. Ed traded up to a handheld gas-powered model, but since he's got a bum shoulder, he's considering a backpack blower, which distributes the weight more evenly than a handheld.

No matter which kind of blower you use, nozzle type is key. Our tests have shown that a round, reduced opening is better for cleaning embedded lawn debris and that a wider, flat opening works better when moving large leaf piles.

A final tip: If you do go the raking route, follow this expert advice to avoid injury and minimize soreness.—Gian Trotta | e-mail | Twitter | Forums | Facebook

Essential information: Check out our "Fall Lawn and Yard Checklist" for details on tending to all facets of your property, and keep your power equipment in shape with our "End-of-Season Lawn-Equipment Guide." You'll find other tips on our Fall Cleanup Guide page.

Inside Consumer Reports Tests Labs: New front-loading washing machines from Whirlpool and Maytag

Reviews of the Whirlpool Duet Steam WFW9750W[W] and Duet Sport WFW9150W[W] and Maytag Performance Series MHWE950W[W]

What's the biggest laundry-related gripe Americans have? The musty smell that befouls clothes left to sit in the washing machine after washing is the top "unmet consumer concern in the laundry room," according to a Whirlpool Corporation survey.

To address the odor problem, Whirlpool has equipped some of its front-loaders with low-energy fans to circulate air and also programmed the machines to tumble periodically. As part of the testing for our continuously updated ratings of front-loading and top-loading washing machines (available to subscribers), we recently reviewed three washing machines* with these odor-fighting features.

Note that none of the loads we washed in any machine had an odor, either when the cycle ended or even after the load sat for hours. Further, there were no odors evident for these tested models regardless of whether the odor-fighting feature was turned on or off, so we cannot report on the claimed odor-preventing ability of these machines. Whirlpool is careful to indicate that these features do not remove an odor but can help prevent one from forming. Our experts suggest that some odors could be from residual soil and bacteria in the clothing or the machine that under the right temperature and moisture conditions are able to propagate.

The Whirlpool Duet Steam WFW9750W[W], $1,300 (shown), has what the manufacturer calls FanFresh, which is designed to prevent odors by circulating air with a fan and tumbling wet laundry every 15 minutes for up to 10 hours. This front-loader did an excellent job overall in our tests. It proved very good at our washing, gentleness, vibration, and water-extraction tests. The WFW9750W[W] also aced our energy- and water-efficiency tests, has a large, 21-pound capacity and was relatively quiet over its 65-minute normal cycle. Its NightQuiet option reduces noise by using a lower spin speed, though this mode also slightly reduces the amount of water extracted from loads.

The Whirlpool Duet Sport WFW9150W[W], $700, has an option, called TumbleFresh, that circulates clothes every 15 minutes for up to six hours. This front-loader, with a sizable, 18-pound capacity, performed very good overall. It aced our gentleness, energy- and water-efficiency tests and was very good at extracting water and in the vibration tests but was only mediocre in our washing tests. It also proved relatively noisy over its 55-minute normal cycle.

The Maytag Performance Series MHWE950W[W], $1,300, is made by Whirlpool and is basically the same machine as the Whirlpool Duet Steam WFW9750W[W], with a similar 21-pound capacity. Its Fresh Hold option tumbles wet laundry every 15 minutes for up to 10 hours and uses a fan to circulate air. The MHWE950W[W] was top-notch overall and excelled in our tests for energy and water efficiency and extracting water. It earned very good scores for washing, gentleness, and vibration. This model operates relatively quietly over its 65-minute normal cycle; its "quiet" option slows the spin speed to dampen noise, though this mode slightly reduces the water extracted from clothes.—Kimberly Janeway | e-mail | Twitter | Forums | Facebook

Essential reading: If you need new laundry equipment, check out our free buyer's guide to washers and buying advice for dryers. If you're in the market for new appliances, stay up on the news related to the $300 million State Energy Efficient Appliance Rebate Program, also known as cash for clunkers for appliances.

*We purchased these appliances from the manufacturer before they were available in stores; we will confirm the test results below on versions that we buy at retail.

What's new in Consumer Reports: Home content from the December 2009 issue

The December 2009 issue of Consumer Reports is loaded with coverage of items that will make practical gifts or spectacular additions to any household. (Some items below are available only to subscribers.)

Low-cost, high-performing coffeemakers. We found excellent coffeemakers that cost $20, $40, and $70; the top-rated model topped out at $100. And for $80, you can buy an excellent brew-station type that lets you fill cups directly from the machine.

Lack of versatility dogs pet-hair vacuums. Many vacuums are specifically marketed as the solution to pet-hair problems, but we found none provided a universal panacea. Instead, two mainstream Hoover models stood out for being excellent against pet hair, very good on bare floors, and excellent at cleaning carpets and limiting emissions.

Microwaves that do more. Want convection and speed cook modes? Countertop models from Kenmore and newcomer-to-the-field Cuisinart and an over- the-range model from Samsung offer both; the Cusinart and Samsung also offer grill modes for a taste of summer during the cold months. We also took a look at the innovative Sharp SuperSteam Oven AX-1200[K].

Ranges that make the grade. Induction models are hot, but our tested ones remain pricey at $3,000. Instead, we found four under-$800 ranges from Kenmore and GE that outscored pricier ranges from Dacor and Viking. Move up to the $1,500-to-$2,000 price point, and you'll get a range with a second oven or cooking drawer.

Paper towels in store. Our tests confirmed a similar trend among foods, where store brands outperformed national brands. So you might want to pick some up when you're buying wrapping paper. We also found something for greens to celebrate: One brand of recycled paper performed very well overall. Watch the video on how we test paper towels (above).

Light's (you should toss) out. Discard holiday lights after three seasons. Here's a checklist of things to look for and safe practices to follow when hanging holiday lights.

Inside Consumer Reports Test Labs: Putting carpet shampooers through their paces

Last week we told you about a scary-looking tool our technicians are experimenting with to embed pet hair into carpeting as part of vacuum testing. This week, for our scheduled March 2010 report on carpet cleaners (online and on newsstands in early February), other testers have been using a big roller that grinds topsoil into panels of off-white carpeting. This device is designed to replicate the abuse the carpeting in your home might be subjected to by a gaggle of dirty-sneaker-wearing kids.

The testers let the dirt set for 24 hours then vacuum the panels with a conventional upright vacuum. Next, they use a carpet cleaner (shown) filled with the manufacturer-recommended solution. To determine how well each appliance cleans the carpeting, testers use a colorimeter to measure the color change from the cleaning process.

Known by a variety of names—carpet shampooers, extractors, carpet cleaners, deep cleaners—the 11 different machines we're testing include a rental model and two handhelds. Among the messes these cleaners have to tackle in the lab are coffee, red wine, and tomato sauce. And since wet carpeting can develop mold or mildew, testers also weigh the panels before and after each test to find out how much moisture remains. Beyond that type of quantitative analysis, testers also look at how convenient each machine is to use and which features matter most.

We're aware that many of you are deeply interested in carpet cleaners, so we'll continue to update you on our testing.—Kimberly Janeway | e-mail | Twitter | Forums | Facebook

Essential information: Our free buyer's guide to carpet cleaners offers helpful shopping advice. If you're looking for a new vacuum, check out our ratings of canister, upright, and stick and handheld models (available to subscribers).

Inside Consumer Reports Test Labs: Latest washing-machine reviews

Tests of the Frigidaire Affinity FAFW3511K[W] and LG SteamWasher WM2801H[W]A front-loaders and GE Profile WPRE8150K[WT] and Speed Queen AWN542 top-loaders

Four washers, four price tags, and a mountain of laundry. Our experts washed 265 pounds of laundry to find out just how well the Frigidaire Affinity FAFW3511K[W], LG SteamWasher WM2801H[W]A, GE Profile WPRE8150K[WT] HE, Speed Queen AWN542 perform. Once again, they found that spending more doesn't guarantee you'll get a better washer. Here are the details:

At $700, the Frigidaire Affinity FAFW3511K[W] is one of the lower-priced front-loaders in our continuously updated ratings of front-loading and top-loading washing machines (available to subscribers). But unlike most front-loaders we test, which are very good or excellent at washing, this Frigidaire was mediocre. It does have a short cycle time, 50 minutes compared with 65 to 105 minutes for other front-loaders.

This washer scored a very good overall, as it aced our energy- and water-efficiency tests, excelled in extracting water, and notched a very good score for gentleness. The stainless-steel tub holds 17 pounds of laundry, earning it an excellent in capacity. While the FAFW3511K[W] earned a very good in our vibration tests, you might not want this machine adjacent to main living areas, as it's relatively noisy.

LG touts that its $1,200 LG SteamWasher WM2801H[W]A front-loader (shown) offers "ultra capacity." Indeed, the stainless-steel tub on this front-loader holds 21 pounds, giving it an excellent score for capacity. Overall, it's a very good washer, performing very good in our washing and vibration tests and excelling in our extraction and energy- and water-efficiency tests. Cycle time is 100 minutes, and while that longer cycle time could lead to frayed fabrics, this LG scored very good in gentleness. It is a relatively noisy appliance, however. Features include a steam function designed to refresh garments and reduce wrinkles.

You won't find an agitator in the $650 GE Profile WPRE8150K[WT] high-efficiency top-loader, which allows this washer to hold 16 pounds of laundry, more than most conventional top-loaders. The WPRE8150K[WT] was very good overall and provides very good washing. Typical of HE washers, it uses less water over its 50-minute cycle because it fills only partly. It aced our water-efficiency tests but was mediocre in our tests for gentleness, noise, energy efficiency, and extraction. Features include a stainless-steel tub, a sensor that determines how much water is needed, and second-rinse and extended-spin cycles.

Conventional top-loaders, in which a tall center post like an agitator swirls the laundry, are the least expensive type of washing machine but tend to perform less impressively as a group. The Speed Queen AWN542 costs $800, more than twice the price of some conventional top-loaders, and was just good overall, ranking near the bottom of our ratings. The AWN542 was mediocre in washing, energy and water efficiency, extraction, and noise, though it did excel in our vibration test. Its stainless-steel tub holds 12 pounds of laundry, earning it only a fair in capacity.—Kimberly Janeway | e-mail | Twitter | Forums | Facebook

Essential reading: Check out or free buyer’s guides to washers and dryers and find the best laundry detergent to use. If you're in the market for new, more-efficient appliances, read our FAQ on the $300 million State Energy Efficient Appliance Rebate Program, aka cash for clunkers for appliances.

Want to enhance your love life? Do more housework

A recent study of nearly 7,000 married couples posits a promising premise for those who hate housework: Slaving over a hot stove could also turn up the heat on your love life, as might vacuuming the carpeting, doing laundry, and undertaking other chores. The study, covered in today's Wall Street Journal, was based on a nationwide survey of families and households and published on the Web site of the Journal of Family Issues.

Data from "Who Has the Time? The Relationship Between Household Labor Time and Sexual Frequency" and other studies provide some strong incentive to tackle more chores: The more housework you do, the more likely you are to have sex with your spouse.

Note to men: Balancing the inequity between the amount of work you and your wife probably couldn't hurt either. Wives spend roughly 42 hours a week cleaning, cooking, washing dishes and clothes, ironing, and the like compared with only about 24 hours for husbands. If you're a guy who's averse to doing laundry or cooking, note that the JFI study includes chores like yard work and car maintenance—yet another reason to crank up the leaf blower or change the oil on your minivan.

Another study quoted in The Wall Street Journal's article placed "sharing household chores" right behind faithfulness and a happy sexual relationship, while still another linked housework by husbands to more feelings of warmth and affection from their wives.

The Journal of Family Issues' study didn't explore whether you can do so much housework that you're too tired for sex. But a nationally representative poll of 1,000 adults conducted by the Consumer Reports National Research Center and published last Valentine's Day found that 81 percent of respondents said they had avoided or delayed sex with their partner in the past year. The two most common reasons: "Too tired" and "too sick."

The bottom line for couch potatoes: Helping out at home is likely to help your love life. Just don't overdo it.—Bob Markovich | e-mail | Twitter | Forums | Facebook

Essential information: Our reviews of vacuum cleaners, washing machines, kitchen appliances, lawn mowers, snow blowers, and other power equipment include models that help make chores less onerous. Also read our advice for making easier work of fall cleanup.

Inside Consumer Reports Test Labs: Reviews of new vacuums from Eureka, Miele, Panasonic, and Electrolux

Hoping to save the world as well as your carpets? Looking for the ultimate vacuum for pet hair? Our testers weigh manufacturer claims as part of testing for our continuously updated ratings of upright and canister vacuums (available to subscribers, along with our October 2009 report on vacuums), and what they find is often less than meets the eye.

Eureka says its EnviroVac 3041 upright, $72 (shown), "delivers powerful cleaning results while using 33 percent less energy than a typical upright vacuum." We judged this 16-pound vacuum very good overall, especially for cleaning bare floors and picking up pet hair with low emissions, though carpet cleaning was only good. The energy-use claim didn't bowl us over either. That's because using an 8-amp upright vacuum instead of the typical 12-amp model would save you only about $3 a year—assuming you vacuum an hour a week and pay the national-average price for electricity.

When it came to pet hair, another newly tested Eureka, the Pet Pal 4716, $80, wasn't so friendly. “Plastic teeth loosen it, rubber strip grabs it and bristles remove it” is how the manufacturer details the pet-hair process, which may be how the stair and upholstery tool works, but on two models of the Pet Pal 4716 the agitator brush jammed and quickly wore the belt to breaking when picking up large amounts of cat hair, earning it a score of poor. This upright also scored a poor for airflow with tools.

Inside Consumer Reports Test Labs: Electrolux UltraSilencer EL6986 canister is quiet, but does it clean well?

Most vacuum cleaners whine or whir their way through our noise tests without getting loud enough for us to recommend that you wear hearing protection during regular use. Still, countless reader letters and user reviews tell us that noise is a big concern among consumers.

So we were pleasantly surprised when one of the six upright and canister vacuums we just tested aced our rigorous noise tests. Claiming "whisper-quiet cleaning that a baby can sleep through," the Electrolux UltraSilencer EL6986 canister, $300 (shown), wasn't quite as quiet as a whisper. But this Electrolux is the quietest of the canisters in our continuously updated ratings of canister and upright vacuums (available to subscribers).

Most consumers also want a vacuum that does a strong job cleaning carpets, but those that do the best at our carpet-cleaning test tend to have a larger, noisier motor and, on canisters, a powered head that adds to the noise. The UltraSilencer lacks a motorized powered head and is geared more toward hard surfaces. The combination of a nonmotorized powered head and quiet operation seem to impact carpet cleaning, for which it earned a good. That's typical for many canisters but below the best for this key test. The UltraSilencer EL6986 scored impressively on bare floors—ideal if you don't have rugs or carpeting at home. Its airflow with tools, used when cleaning drapes and upholstery, was mediocre.

Manufacturers are obviously aware of the noise issue: The newly tested Miele S 7580 is one of only two uprights judged very good in our noise tests. (The other is the Dyson DC24 Ball All Floors). Unlike the Electrolux, the Miele was among the best at cleaning carpets, with fine bare-floor performance, excellent pet-hair pickup, and low emissions. A swivel-steer handle is supposed to make handling and turning easier. But at 22 pounds, the Miele S 7580 is among the heavier uprights in our ratings, and it costs a pricey $800.

If you want an affordable vacuum that cleans well and isn't too noisy, consider that the better a vacuum cleans, the fewer passes you'll need to make with it and the sooner you'll be done. Among the canisters and uprights we've tested, you'll find several reasonably quiet models that do a fine job with carpets and bare floors.—Ed Perratore | e-mail | Twitter | Forums | Facebook

Essential information: If you're in the market for a new vacuum cleaner, check out our free buyer's guide and our latest Inside Consumer Reports Test Labs posts.

Recent study points to showerheads as bacterial breeding ground

Taking a shower can provide a bracing wake-up call or settle the nerves after a hectic day. But a new study from the University of Colorado, which suggests that the typical showerhead can be an ideal breeding ground for bacteria commonly found in municipal water supplies, might give you pause the next time you step into the shower. The study, "Opportunistic Pathogens Enriched in Showerhead Biofilms," appeared in a recent online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Begun as a class project, the study expanded to include 45 sites in nine metropolitan areas, including New York, Chicago, and Denver. Through the very DNA of the pathogens lodged in the nooks and crannies of about 50 showerheads, researchers identified numerous bacteria, notably Mycobacterium avium, a relative of the organism that causes tuberculosis (PDF).

Bacteria found in showerheads tend to clump together in slimy biofilms, the so-called soap scum that builds up on the showerhead's plastic components, explained Norman R. Pace, Ph.D., lead study author and a professor of microbiology at the university. When a shower is on, pathogens accompany the water droplets that become suspended in the air. Besides coating the shower-curtain liner or walls of the shower enclosure, these droplets are easily inhaled deeply into the lungs.

M. avium, often present in soil, is among a class of nontuberculous mycobacteria, or NTM, described as "ubiquitous" by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But although M. avium accounts for most known infections by NTM, M. avium has not been well documented as a source of infection since suspected cases of NTM infection don't have to be reported to the CDC.

What's certain is that, while M. avium complex, or MAC, is unlikely to affect most people, if contracted it could potentially cause pulmonary disease, with symptoms similar to those of tuberculosis, including a chronic shallow cough, fever, fatigue, and weight loss. Most at risk, however, are those with compromised immune systems, including people with cystic fibrosis or AIDS or who are elderly, pregnant, or otherwise immune compromised.

The study focused on showerheads, but your home has other potential hot spots, such as a humidifier not cleaned thoroughly, hot tubs, and food-prep areas. Even indoor air carries bacteria, but municipal tap water has 10 times the amount commonly found in indoor air before it even reaches the showerhead. And there's no proof that raising the temperature of your water heater would make a significant difference; the culprit is continuous moisture.

Whether or not you're especially at risk, here's what you can do to try to prevent any bacterial problems in the shower: