Heart-attack prevention: Statins aren’t for everybody
I started getting phone calls from my patients almost as soon as the headlines starting appearing last week. All the media were trumpeting the results of a new study showing that rosuvastatin (Crestor), a powerful cholesterol-lowering statin drug, slashed the risk of heart attack and stroke even in people with normal—that’s right, normal—cholesterol levels who also had high blood levels of a substance called C-reactive protein. CRP rises when the arteries are inflamed, and, as we’ve previously reported, growing research has linked such inflammation with an increased risk of heart attack. All of those callers wanted to know the same thing: Should they start taking the drug?
Here’s my answer to that and two related questions.
Should I immediately start taking a statin?
Probably not, at least based on this study. The trial, released on Nov. 9 by the New England Journal of Medicine, looked at some 18,000 people with an LDL (bad) cholesterol level less than 130 milligrams per deciliter and a CRP level over 2 mg per liter. Half got Crestor and half got a placebo. After about two years the study was halted because there were 44 percent fewer cardiovascular events in one group than in the other. The winner turned out to be the group that took Crestor.
Sounds impressive, right? Well, maybe not very. That’s because cardiovascular disease is relatively uncommon in the group of people enrolled in the study. So the absolute reduction in the rate of heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death went from about 2 per 100 patients in the placebo group to 1 per 100 in the treatment group. At that rate, 120 people would have to be treated for nearly two years to prevent one event. A benefit, yes, but is it one that’s worth the treatment’s costs?
Continue reading "Heart-attack prevention: Statins aren’t for everybody" »




