2010 Cadillac CTS – Flash-to-pass, part 3

Sometimes we wonder why is it so hard for some companies to do something that everybody else does as a matter of course. Nearly two years ago we took GM to task for a flaw on the very nice 2008 Cadillac CTS. That car lacked a flash-to-pass headlight feature. GM promised to correct that, and they have--partially.
 
The omission affected CTS versions with bi-xenon headlights which come on the Premium trim line.
 
We just purchased a new CTS sedan with the direct-injection 3.6-liter V6, Premium package and FE2 suspension.
 
Indeed, GM has not only added the flash-to-pass feature but notes triumphantly that it didn’t even cost them any money. The feature was there all along but it was disabled, GM explains, for bulb-longevity reasons. Frankly, the longevity argument doesn’t cut much ice. Xenon lights already have a much longer life expectation than halogens. But here’s the real caveat: The CTS’s new flash-to–pass is momentary. The high beam duration is merely one second regardless of how long you squeeze the left stalk. If you hold it with the intention of maintaining high beams for several seconds, you still get only one single flash that goes off after the one second, which is unlike almost any other car. You might have to blip the stalk multiple times to get an inattentive driver’s attention.
 
Examining the headlight unit reveals that there is no dedicated bulb for the flash-to-pass feature, which other bi-xenon systems employ. The CTS instead only briefly triggers the regular high beam. That’s a creative (read: cheap) way to get off the hook. We’ll take it for now, but it’s no free pass. Hopefully, it won’t take another two years to get a continuous flash-to-pass.

See the related posts:
The stalk that broke the Cadillac CTS' back
No flash-to-pass for Cadillac CTS, part 2
 
—Gabe Shenhar

First impression: Suzuki Kizashi

“Does the world really need another family sedan?” During a visit from Suzuki, this was the opening line of the execs’ presentation—not a question we asked them.

The marketing rationale follows the assumption that the potential Kizashi buyer wouldn’t want a Toyota Camry or Honda Accord—that was their parents’ car. And that the “Euro-inspired” handling, compact size, “interior design,” and optional AWD will also appeal to a new generation of buyers. Volume expectations are modest, according to Suzuki. Pricing spans roughly between $20,000 and $27,000.

The Kizashi is a pure Suzuki design that doesn’t trace its roots to GM or Daewoo. It was designed to be sold in world markets and adapts the D-segment size standard, which means it straddles a Corolla and Camry in terms of dimensions.

We briefly drove a high end Kizashi with 18-inch wheels and all the bells and whistles. Bottom line: We were not impressed. The 2.4-liter engine mated to the CVT isn’t the most cultured powertrain out there. The ride is rather stiff, and the steering, in our judgment, has very little European inspiration, if at all. The interior is nothing special, but the cabin has a pleasing appearance and decent seats.

We’ll have more details on the Kizashi in the coming months when we put it through our battery of tests on our track and publish a full review.

The Kizashi will join the Subaru Legacy and Ford Fusion as the third AWD mainstream family sedan. It goes on sale by the end of 2009.

—Gabe Shenhar

2009 Frankfurt Motor Show: 2010 BMW 5 Series Gran Turismo

BMW brought a pre-production 5 Series Gran Turismo to the annual International Motor Press Association (IMPA) event at the Pocono Raceway in Pennsylvania, some days before its official Frankfurt debut this week.
 
The 5 GT is an odd creature: neither a sedan nor a wagon and too wide and long to visually register as a hatchback. But call it a hatchback anyway. Porsche gets away with that classification for the Panamera, right? It joins a new emerging vehicle breed to soon be joined by the Acura ZDX and Honda Crosstour.
 
BMW says the 5 GT shares most of its essentials with the 7 Series. Given the width of the car and the nearly identical dash layout, that seems credible. BMW folks also whisper that the GT also hints at the look of the next 5 Series, due here around the summer of 2010, but the 5 sedan will have a smaller footprint.
 
The idea behind the 5 GT is to combine first-class luxury with a high level of functionality. For instance, you can discretely open just the bottom half of the two-piece rear hatch, or lift the whole gate, as in a traditional hatchback. The base model will seat five; more luxurious versions will seat only four. The base engine for the United States is likely to be the 300-hp twin-turbo in-line six cylinder. Although the 5 GT is rear-drive only, it will be priced roughly on par with the X6. Figure at least $60,000 to start.

The 5 GT goes on sale in December 2009. 

—Gabe Shenhar

Personal Picks: Sporty and muscle cars, part 1

In our October 2009 issue sporty car round up, the modern Detroit muscle cars are the stars. The latest Ford Mustang GT faces off against the reborn Chevrolet Camaro and Dodge Challenger. The glory days of classic muscle cars may have come and gone, though these modern interpretations of performance legends provide a compelling argument that these are the best of performance times.
 
These reborn automotive icons have each staged their own form of a comeback. The Mustang arguably made its triumphant return with the 2005 redesign, and the latest evolution has improved the breed. The Camaro and Challenger have emerged with retro-inspired style and decidedly modern performance, reminiscent of classic comebacks like Tina Turner, 1980 U.S. Olympic hockey team, and George Foreman. (Well, he sells lots of grills…).
 
Of course, many younger automotive enthusiasts were not weened on pony cars, but rather import performance cars. For that set, we also have tested the Nissan 370Z, Subaru WRX, and Hyundai Genesis Coupe in our most recent test group. Clearly, there’s probably something for near-every car enthusiast.
 
But when it comes to which of these cars bend our heartstrings, the votes certainly aren’t unanimous, as some prefer agility over brute muscle. Here are our initial picks for this most-entertaining group, with other installments to be posted over the next few days.
 
Gabe Shenhar: If we’re talking exclusively muscle cars we tested for this issue, my pick is definitely the Mustang. Although fundamentally less sophisticated than the new Camaro, it hides it well and ultimately proves to be the more enjoyable driver’s car. To boot, it’s also the more livable everyday car.
 
However, none of these cars are exactly my cup of tea.
 
The Mazda RX-8 is. This forgotten car is incredibly rewarding to drive, with its smooth-revving rotary engine, slick shifter and lithe handling. It’s also practical, at least as coupes go, with its well-hidden rear-hinged doors and semi-habitable rear seat. Although dating back to 2003, to me, it still looks great.
 
Another appealing alternative would be a used BMW 3 Series coupe. A 2007 328i, with a manual transmission and Sports Package, can be had for about $28,000. With its punchy straight-six, terrific steering and perfect body control, not only is it spectacular to drive, it also looks gorgeous -- which is partly why you’d choose a coupe, anyway.
 
Rick Small: I grew up in the muscle car era and have always had a place in my heart for these cars. Through the years, though, they became dated and fell out of style to the point that Chevrolet and Dodge discontinued theirs. I think the revised and retro Mustang of a couple of years ago (re)created the market segment, just as it did back in 1964. Its success once again sent Chevy and Dodge back to the drawing board to come up with some competition. And now we have a new Camaro and Challenger.
 
Of this group I find that the Mustang is the best for me. The 315-hp, 4.6-liter V8 delivers strong acceleration. The Mustang also has agile handling and the exhaust sound is always very pleasing. This engine, with the slick-shifting five-speed manual transmission, delivers a nice combination of power and economy: Expect 20 mpg overall in mixed driving on regular fuel. The driving position also fits my tall frame well and access and vision are better than the others. It’s very easy to live with as a daily driver.
 
The Camaro and Challenger are also good looking but overall are not as rewarding to drive. The Camaro is very fast but the interior feels claustrophobic and is hard to see out. The shifter, ride and economy also all fall short of the Mustang’s. The Challenger is a nice highway cruiser but handling is on the clumsy side.
 
One surprise: The Hyundai Genesis coupe deserves a look also. It delivers V8-like performance with its 306-hp, 3.8-liter V6. This powertrain even gets a commendable 23 mpg overall on regular fuel. It has crisp handling, nice interior…and Hyundai is building very reliable cars these days. The rear seat is almost useless, though, with little leg room and even less head room. The six-speed manual transmission and clutch were hard to shift smoothly especially going from first to second gear. We’re told that later models have refined engine mapping to correct this. Still, this car was the sleeper in the group.

Driving with an injury: Features that can ease the pain

Earlier this summer I had the misfortune of getting injured in a bicycle accident. I was biking with my 13-year-old son and somehow we got into a pile-up. He fell the right way on the soft ground and weeds by the side of the road. After a tumble or two, bounced back and declared, “I’m okay!” Following closely behind, I managed to fall the wrong way, on the pavement and ended up with two broken elbows. My left elbow is almost entirely healed, but my right elbow needs surgery and for now I’m wearing a bionic brace. Being chastised in the office goes without saying: “High performance antics on the track, testing Vespas and Ninjas, and then a bicycle does you in?” or “From now on, only motorized vehicles for you!”

Besides being incredibly grateful that my son emerged unscathed, I have come to a new appreciation, surveying our vehicle test fleet, of what everyday life must be like for people with physical challenges or limited mobility.

For me right now, the key is low-effort everything and minimizing movements requiring my right arm. I have a newfound appreciation for a quiet cabin, a comfortable ride, easy access, and a view out that doesn’t require straining or craning. Automatic transmission is a given for now.

Here are 12 more items that make my temporary limitation easier to live with:

1. Push-button start: Eliminates the need to twist the wrist to turn a key.
2. Electronic parking brake: Requires only push/pull finger action, and also saves space.
3. Adjustable armrest: Allows optimal positioning of the elbow.
4. Power adjustable steering column: No need to grope beneath the steering column and pry loose a stiff lever.
5. Power seat: Low-effort fore-and-aft and recline adjustments. Power lumbar support is a bonus. 
6. Automatic climate control: Set the temperature once and be done with it. No need to fumble for out-of-reach controls.
7. Steering-wheel-mounted audio controls: Change volume and stations without having to lift a hand off the wheel.
8. Rain-sensing wipers: No grasping or twisting a wiper lever.
9. Auto headlights: No need to take my left hand off the wheel to turn them on or off.
10. One-touch power windows (up and down): No need to press and hold, leaving my left hand on the wheel.
11. Doors that unlock and open when you pull the inside latch: Takes away the need to look for the central lock switch.
12. Strong door detents: Doors that stay open on my slightly sloped driveway without the need to fight them back.

These may seem like small conveniences, or even outright frills—until you need them. How often have I heard someone say, “What the heck was wrong with just twisting a key?”, “That’s just a gimmick for the sake of being different,” or “That’s just another thing to go wrong?” Sometimes I’ve been one of those voices.

Clearly, as a result of my very close-up view of the pavement some weeks back, I now see and appreciate these as ergonomic assets and perhaps even essential ones.

—Gabe Shenhar

Personal Picks: Midsized SUVs

Models such as the Ford Explorer, Honda Pilot, Jeep Grand Cherokee, Toyota Highlander have been popular for years. This group easily makes up the bulk of SUV sales, probably because you can choose get almost any combination of three-row seating, good off-road abilities, luxury-lined cabins, boat-pulling grunt, or hybrid technology. Really, there’s something for everyone.

A recent Consumer Reports test group included a diverse cross-section of SUVs: the Chevrolet Traverse, Kia Borrego, Infiniti FX35, and Lexus RX 350. While the Chevrolet and Kia lean toward the practical side (both have 3rd-row seats), the Lexus and Infiniti, respectively, treat drivers to luxurious cabins and relatively sporty handling.

But when the rubber meets the road, which ones would we buy? Take a look at the testers’ personal picks:

Rick Small: While the Lexus RX is nice overall, it’s very expensive. I would save some money and buy the very similar Toyota Venza. The Infiniti FX is very quick and sporty, but it is a bit cramped for my tall frame and not as roomy or versatile as many in this group. The Borrego is priced right but rides stiffly, and it is not as economical as most in this category. The Traverse is the best of the GM offerings -- it does most things well and is roomy and not bulky to drive. However, reliability is still an open question. Overall, I still prefer the Nissan Murano. It has a good combination of comfort, performance, and fuel economy. The Honda Pilot is also a roomy, reliable choice but not if you are looking for a sporty ride. I look forward to testing the new Chevrolet Equinox, which looks promising with its choice of four-cylinder or V6 engines. Plus, it’s not as big as the Traverse, so it should handle better and be more economical.

Gabe Shenhar: Among these types of SUVs, I’m leaning toward the luxury end. I’ve always been drawn to the BMW X5. I think it looks great and it drives beautifully. It very much possesses the steering precision and body control you’d associate with a BMW. And, if you get the diesel, 22 mpg is pretty sweet for a vehicle this size. But it also costs a pile of money. No matter how you slice it, you’re hovering around $60K. That’s why my sensible side leads me to the Acura MDX. It’s smooth and refined, and it drives in a responsive, relatively connected way without beating you up. In terms of value for the money, I think it’s unbeatable. Everyone in my circle of friends and family to whom I’ve recommended the MDX couldn’t be happier.

And yet, both the X5 and MDX have become such an overly popular suburban soccer-mom mobile that I find myself balking at the idea. And both are kind of large for my personal taste. That’s exactly why I could see myself getting the new Audi Q5. It’s just the right size, so you don’t feel like you’re driving a truck. It has enough room, provided you are giving up the third row. It has a beautiful interior that’s tasteful, luxurious, and quiet. Most importantly, the Q5 is entertaining to drive with a sporty demeanor, good steering and a nice powertrain. As an extra bonus it also looks great. CRO subscribers can read about it on the Audi Q5 model overview page.  Or you’ll find it in the September issue of CR.

Mike Quincy: I so wanted to like the new Toyota Venza. It just seemed like the right size, and the styling really caught my eye. And when I drove it into New York for the city’s auto show, I got lots of questions from the parking attendants. They were mostly dazzled by the Venza’s slick lines and 20-inch wheels. But driving the Toyota made me feel like I had, well, influ-venza. The ride was harsh and noisy, I couldn’t see out of it, the steering felt dead, and the whole package needs to visit Jenny Craig. Instead, for a small-family-sized SUV with some pizzazz, I’d go with the Mazda CX-9. The Mazda’s handling is quite engaging, and the powertrain is surprisingly responsive. Three-row seating helps when my young boys want to each bring a friend to the movies, and the cargo area easily holds my bike. I wish the CX-9’s fuel economy was better (only 16 mpg overall), but, for me, it strikes the right balance between the nice-but-dull Highlander and the sporty but expensive and smaller FX35.

American Personal Picks: July 4th Edition

To celebrate the 4th of July, the Consumer Reports Autos team put together its patriotic personal picks focused on the American-brand models they would most like to own. Or, imagine that you’ve just accepted a new job with great pay and benefits, including a new car. However, you employer insists that it be an American-branded car. So we asked which one would you choose and why?

Car type and price were left wide open, giving the engineers and editors freedom to choose from the broad model pantheon from Chrysler, Ford, and General Motors. Interesting, many of the same vehicles were repeated throughout the picks.

Read on to see the red, white, and blue selections here, and comment below with your own choices this holiday weekend. For a more official take, see our post “Consumer Reports American Top Picks 2009.” 

Jeff Bartlett: For a practical choice, I would zero in on the Ford Fusion—A well-mannered, fuel-efficient sedan that is a terrific value and practical choice, made more appealing with its 2010 update. Beyond that, I see precious little from the Detroit 3 that would appeal to my below-$25,000 sensibilities. I favor a hatchback for versatility and prize personality. Not much meets that description from Detroit.

However, were gasoline once again cheap as water, the Chevrolet Camaro SS would be a slam dunk. It is a 30-year dream realized, almost. I have long wanted a first-gen Camaro reinvented with a modern chassis, powertrain, and safety features. But having driven it, I find I also want head room, rearward visibility, and more polished interior. Still, the new model drives as good as in my fantasy, looks stunning, and has terrific power. Should I trip over a lottery ticket or leprechaun, it would be a Corvette in the driveway, again. The Z06 and ZR1 deliver exotic-car performance in an all-American sports car, though I would choose the new Grand Sport version. The name alone conjures a legendary heritage. This special-edition has Z06 appearance elements and brakes, distinctive trim details, and a more-than-adequate 436-horsepower LS3 V8. Yeah, that’d be it.

David Champion: I would choose the Ford Fusion, Flex or Chevrolet Traverse. The Fusion’s top-notch reliability is a real breakthrough for a domestic brand and the car is fun to drive. The Flex is just the right size to carry either people or cargo—it’s comfortable and quiet and makes for a great road-trip vehicle. If I were in the market for a three-row SUV, the Traverse would be on my list for its ability to handle a variety of duties, plus its ride and handling are impressive for its size. But its sibling’s first-year reliability has been very disappointing.

Eric Evarts: If I could afford a $40,000 entry-level luxury sedan, there’s no better example on the market in my book than the new Cadillac CTS. It’s quicker than a BMW, handles as well, has more room inside, and looks wicked. While earlier CTS’s had cheesy-looking and poorly laid out interiors, the new one’s feels rich, and much warmer, more practical, and easy to use than European equivalents. Even better, I could get it with all-wheel-drive to get home from work up my hill in a snowstorm. (In fact, my neighbor did.) Even the automatic transmission that comes with the all-wheel-drive model is smooth, crisp, and responsive. So it doesn’t feel like a sacrifice.

But you don’t have to spend $40,000 to get a great American car. I prefer the new Chevrolet Malibu and the Ford Fusion to the Toyota Camry and the new Honda Accord, which both feel too big to me—even if I really like the VW Passat better than any of them.

Mike Leung: For me, I like the Cadillac CTS-V and Chevrolet Corvette. They’re stylish and fun to drive. Although the practical side of me would also go for the standard CTS, which is less fun to drive, but it has a very nice interior and is still quite stylish.

Tom Mutchler: A dream of mine is to get a 25-foot Airstream along with a pickup truck as a tow vehicle. Starting out with a smaller RV for now, I picked up a used T@B teardrop trailer, choosing our 2009 Chevrolet Silverado to go get it. We put 1,400 miles in three days on that truck and found it to be a comfortable and easy-to-live-with travel companion. Sure, a loaded Avalanche or a GMC Sierra Denali would be sweet, but a “modest” Silverado remains a very nice truck. I want one.

But a truck isn’t exactly what I want for a daily driver. Lots of domestic cars qualify. The Chevrolet Malibu is one of my favorite family sedans; I’d take a four-cylinder LT over the stiffer-riding LTZ. We found that the four-cylinder Malibu’s fuel economy beat the four-cylinder Accord and Camry in our tests, and I find the Malibu more stylish than the Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan. If I got a management job, maybe I could swing a Cadillac CTS—a very appealing sports sedan.

Finally, I’ve come very close—more than once—to buying a Ford SVT Contour or Focus. Both were tremendously satisfying driver’s cars. There isn’t really anything in Ford’s domestic fleet that currently qualifies, but I’m looking forward to the upcoming European-based Fords. Even the Transit Connect has steering feel that rivals some sports cars…

Mike Quincy: I’ve grown very fond of the new Dodge Ram pickup truck. It’s quieter inside than a congressional hearing on Wall Street bonuses. But the Ram’s open bed isn’t secure like the Chevrolet Avalanche’s – another truck I love. Tough call between these two. But these vehicles are all work, and I have to weigh in on stuff for play. The Chevrolet Corvette is often my answer to the question “If you could have ANY car, which one would it be?” Corvettes of various generations and horsepower ratings have accompanied me on trips from Boston to Washington, D.C. The combination of awesome power, secure handling and tolerable ride is amazing. I’ve often said that if GM put as much effort into the rest of its line as it so obviously has with the Corvette, it would rule the world. I’m also a big fan of the fun to drive Ford Mustang GT. I love its looks and distinctive V8 rumble, and I’ve enjoyed driving our recently acquired ’09 GT.

Gabe Shenhar: I think the Ford Fusion SEL V6 makes for a good family sedan. Even though it’s based on the previous-generation Mazda6 and is built in Mexico, it qualifies as American by most definitions. The Fusion steers and handles well with a nice ride. For a larger sedan, I’d take the Pontiac G8 GT. I love this car. With Euro-style ride, handling and braking and some rough-and-tumble American muscle, this Aussie import is exactly what the British would call a Q-car – an incognito fierce performance machine. If my budget allowed me to go more upscale, I’d be happy with a Cadillac CTS. This home-grown Detroiter looks gorgeous and drives almost as beautifully as a BMW 5 Series. And I personally think it steers better than an Infiniti G37. The larger Cadillac STS has even more comfort, quietness and roominess thrown in, yet is still a solid, enjoyable drive.

For SUVs, I’d look at the Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited 4.7, really one of Chrysler’s only worthy models. It has a character, looks and the off-road ability befitting a Jeep. And yet, it’s brisk and fairly capable on the road with some handling response and decent seats. For a model with three-row seating, I’d choose the Chevrolet Traverse. It’s roomy and drives well. This coach feels solid and quiet without being the Queen Mary II. And I prefer its looks over its three other siblings. In the absence of a domestic minivan, its functionally comes close to that most-efficient suburban vehicle.

Rick Small: I would buy a Ford Fusion, Flex or Edge. These models have a sportier feel than much of their competition and they’re attractive designs to boot. Discounting for these models is prevalent, so you can get a good deal. The Fusion and Edge are also reliable. Finally, Ford isn’t taking any bail out money (yet) which means the company should be around for awhile.

Personal Picks: Scooters and motorcycles

Summer has arrived, bringing with it warm days and elevated gas prices—conditions that make riding a scooter or motorcycle more appealing. If you are looking to buy your first two-wheeler, there are many things to consider, such as licensing, safety, and model choice. See our scooter and motorcycle report for buying advice, ratings, and safety information. 

For our report, we tested several small scooters (50cc), large scooters (125-150cc), and motorcycles (250cc). We have to confess, the staff enjoyed donning helmets and riding these bikes on our track and real-world streets. Through the process, everyone learned something about entry-level bikes and which they would choose.

Here’s we share personal picks from the test and editorial staffs.

Eric Evarts: There’s no question, the Kawasaki Ninja 250 is great fun to ride. Corners feel invigorating, as you lean the bike into turns, crouched over the handlebars. The little engine screams to redline, which comes up in a flash. And the brakes haul you down like you rode through glue. Best of all, the Ninja costs less than some of the scooters we tested.

For me, though, the best use of a motorized two-wheeler is in not taking a 3,500-pound car on simple, local trips to town for shopping and other errands. And for that, a scooter would work a lot better (providing your errands don’t include a week’s worth of groceries for a family of four). They have a lot more storage space, plus the easy step-through seating and lack of manual gear-shifting makes riding a lot easier. And by far the best scooter of the bunch is the comfortable and capable Kymko People. Its big wheels mean not every pothole is a menace, and it responds more like a motorcycle in curves.

It’s an axiom around here that riding a scooter makes everyone look like a dork. And that may be true. But if we could just man-up the Kymco’s color a little bit, it could feel a bit more righteous, rather than embarrassing.

Mike Leung: The Kymco People was the only scooter I’d consider of the group we tested. It was quick enough, went fast enough and felt the most stable in a corner (I’d remove the kickstand that scrapes on hard cornering, though). Plus, I’d choose a different color.

The Vespa 150 was nice enough in terms of comfort, but its cost is prohibitive and the performance was sub-par for that price tag.

The Honda Ruckus would be good as a pit vehicle at the race track.

Gene Petersen: A lot of people consider purchasing a scooter to save on fuel, but with overall mileage of many being not much better than a hybrid car, I wonder if they make sense. Still, if you’re going the scooter route, there are only really two that we tested that can be used for practical transportation: the Kymco People 150 and Vespa LX 150. Both feel substantial enough to ride securely around town and have just enough power to keep up with the flow of traffic typical of city and suburban roadways. I like the Kymco over the Vespa for its lower leg reach to the ground when at a stop, and the larger wheels bridge over cracks in the road to make for a smoother ride.

Before giving up four wheels for two, I think that anyone considering a scooter should take a scooter/motorcycle safety course.

Mike Quincy: I’ve had a great time getting reacquainted with two-wheeled motorized transportation. Like many, I used to ride but got sidetracked by houses, kids, and getting older. I’m glad to be back.

I like the classic looks of the Vespas we tested, but I can’t get past the price. Over $4,000 for the LX 150? You’ve got to be kidding. These things are supposed to save money.

I think if I spent the summer on Block Island, Martha’s Vineyard, or Nantucket, I’d get a Honda Ruckus. It seems nearly indestructible, has a classically-Honda smooth engine, and a no-nonsense attitude. I’d get it dirty, leave it out in the rain, ride it on the beach, and not worry a bit.

But for all-out fun, nothing comes close to the Kawasaki Ninja 250. It’s so unbelievably easy to ride and more comfortable than it looks. It could be the best bang-for-the-buck of anything with wheels and an engine.

Gabe Shenhar: As a former motorcycle rider, I came in to this test with the notion that scooters are by definition inferior to motorcycles. But now, after testing a bunch of scoots and as a middle-aged man, I discovered that scooters can be fun, a whole lot easier to ride and yet without hurting one’s masculinity. (Ahem – Ed.) They are easy to get on and off, have an upright riding position, under-seat storage, and their CVT automatic transmissions work well.

So with all the sex appeal of motorcycles, for me it’s “been there – done that.” Among the scooters we tested, we were quite surprised with how well the Kymco performed – quick, quiet, stable and sparing with fuel, but I could never see myself on one because it is just sooo ugly. That leaves only the Vespa LX 150 as a viable option – it’s quick enough, comfortable with a just-right riding position, wide and comfy suede seat, and of course, its classic charm.

Jim Travers: I’ve always felt more at ease and in control on motorcycles than scooters. Some may find the high, chair-like seating position of scooters more comfortable and their step-through frames easier to get on and off, but I’ve always felt like I’m perched high atop a scooter, rather than being an extension of it. You use your legs and body to help lean and control a motorcycle much more than you can a scooter, and a motorcycle’s larger wheels and tires add to that feeling of stability.

That said, my pick is the Kawasaki Ninja 250, hands down. The frame fits my own 6’2” frame much better than the Honda Rebel, and the ride is surprisingly comfortable. The Ninja is nimble, with precise handling, and the brakes are terrific. And there’s something about running the sporty, affordable Ninja up through the gears to that 13,000-rpm redline that never gets old. All this, and decent fuel mileage, too.

Diesel power just in: Mercedes GL320, BMW X5 3.0 diesel, BMW 335d

Some automakers have had long-standing plans to offer diesel engines in this country. European automakers have stuck with those strategies despite the volatile price disparity between diesel and regular fuel. Japanese and domestic automakers, including Honda, Nissan and GM, have shelved their diesel plans for now.

Impressed by diesels we’ve previously tested from Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen, we have added three more to our test fleet to see how they compare to their conventional counterparts. Our latest diesel models include the Mercedes-Benz GL320 Blue Tec and a pair of BMWs--the X5 and the 335d.

Mercedes-Benz GL320 Blue Tec
We were impressed with the GL450 when we tested it in 2006--a roomy, comfortable, yet responsive handling vehicle. We were also impressed with the 210-hp, 3.0-liter V6 diesel engine when we tested it in the E320 Blue Tec, which combined strong performance and refinement, yet returned 29 mpg overall. It was also free of traditional diesel smell, smoke, and sluggishness. Hence, we wanted to see how this engine performed in the GL.

Even though the GL is very heavy (5,655 lbs.), this engine remains smooth and muted, but initial off-the-line acceleration is sluggish. Once underway, it pulls strongly and manages to hit 60 mph in less than 10 seconds--a far cry from the 7.4 seconds we recorded for the GL450. Observed fuel economy, so far, is averaging 20 mpg overall. We got 15 mpg for our V8-powered GL450. If you’re starting to crunch the numbers, you should know that the GL320 is actually $1,000 cheaper than the GL450.

The other major difference between the two is that the GL320 comes with 20-inch run-flat tires, which brings more impact-harshness to the ride quality. Plus, the steering feedback is compromised. The GL benefits from a $1,550 federal tax credit for the first 60,000 purchasers, but you won’t qualify if you hit the AMT tax.

BMW X5 3.0 diesel
In contrast to the Mercedes example above, the X5 diesel adds an eye-opening $3,700 to the price of the 265-hp, regular-gas 3.0 model. So far, our diesel X5 is getting 23 mpg on average, compared with 17 mpg overall for the gas version. The X5’s diesel is not quite as refined as the Mercedes but feels punchier. In fact, it beats the regular X5 in 0-60 mph acceleration, but it’s less quick initially from a standstill. Other than that, the diesel X5 retains the choppy ride, excellent steering and agile handling (as well as confusing controls) of the standard X5.

Diesel and gasoline are about equal in price these days, so it’s a matter of how far you drive when it comes to payback time for the diesel version’s higher price. There is also added maintenance due to the replacement of the Urea solution (also required with the Mercedes), which serves in emission-cleaning arsenal. BMW replaces it at service intervals and will warn you 1,000 miles prior. This diesel qualifies for a $1,550 federal tax credit. With that, and at current gas prices, and with an annual mileage of 12,000 miles it would take more than four years to break even.

BMW 335d
On the face of it, there is a $2,275 premium for a 335d over the rear-wheel drive 335i, once adjusted for the standard automatic transmission in the diesel. However, assuming your attitude is one of saving money and fuel, you’d probably look at the more popular 328i. In that case, the diesel commands a whopping $8,975 price premium. So far we’ve been getting 33 mpg with the diesel according to the car’s trip computer. Our last 328i attained 23 mpg overall.

Beyond the questionable economics, the diesel 3 retains its excellent steering and body control and one might argue is even more of a hoot to drive. We haven’t completed our acceleration tests yet, but the torque of the diesel delivers an addicting mid-range rush that, if you’re not careful, will send the car into three-digit speeds all too easily. The 335d benefits from a $900 federal tax credit. With that taken into account it would take about 20 years to break even compared to a 328i at an annual mileage of 12,000.

Bottom line
In general, diesel engines cut fuel consumption by about 30 percent and as a byproduct reduces C02 emissions. And contemporary common-rail diesel combined with devices that abolish smoke and smell make the engines a lot more livable. That said, in terms of particles causing soot, diesels are still not as clean as modern gas engines.

Opting for a diesel in today’s environment may not save you money. It is a function of the price differential to the conventional version, the price of diesel fuel and your annual mileage. Other than economics, any diesel can be fueled with an up to 20 percent bio-diesel blend, which further cuts petroleum consumption. If diesel prices remain similar to gasoline, as they are today, there would be true appeal.

—Gabe Shenhar

Personal Picks: Small cars

With all the doom and gloom news dominating the airwaves these days, it’s good to know that there’s a new, small car that really blew us away...and it doesn’t cost a fortune. For about $17,000, the manual transmission Honda Fit goes from 0-60 mph in under 10 seconds, holds five people (or lots of cargo) and still gets 33 mpg overall. Remember the “economy” cars of the 1980s? While several got terrific fuel economy, none were as comfortable, fun to drive, or as safe as the Fit. It does so many things well, the Fit is the answer to many buyers’ needs.

As gas prices continue to climb, more and more people may retreat to smaller, more fuel-efficient cars. All of the other fuel-thrifty models in this test group--the Chevrolet Aveo, Nissan Versa, Suzuki SX4, and Toyota Yaris--were competing for second place.

But vehicle choice is a personal one, and here are our staff picks:

Mike Quincy: The Smart ForTwo sparks more conversation than just about anything I’ve driven in the last 10 years. But when people ask me about the diminutive design, I immediately bring up the Honda Fit. I’ve repeated these lines so many times: For about the same money as the Smart, the Fit is immensely more fun to drive and easier to live with. The Fit is faster, has superior steering, loads more cargo room, and only gives up 6 mpg overall. I don’t hate the Smart, but there’s no way I’m buying one over a Fit. Finally, what puts the Fit over the top for me is the relationship between its four-cylinder engine and manual transmission. I can’t think of many engine/transmission combinations that come close to the shear precision of their operation. And after running through the gears in our manual Sport model, I have to again remind myself that it only costs $17,000. The Fit is the smartest choice.

Gabe Shenhar: The engineer in me admires the originality of the Honda Fit design. What a genius of a car. With the gas tank mounted under the front seats, rather than the rear seat, it frees up a lot room, which gives the car its amazing spaciousness and in-cabin flexibility. It’s not for nothing the Fit has already established a cult following during the relatively short time it’s been for sale in the U.S.

But I’d have trouble shelling out $16,000 on a new Fit that’s still a noisy and jittery-riding car. For me, a used Mini Cooper for similar money would be much more enjoyable with similar gas mileage, go-kart agility, and nicer interior (but, admittedly, less space). You can’t have everything.

Rick Small: These small sedans are enjoying a surge in popularity due to poor economy and fresh memories of high gas prices. The Subaru Impreza is a nice car, but only comes in AWD--hurting fuel economy--and the driving position doesn’t fit my tall body as well as some. The Hyundai Elantra is very nice, has a long warranty and good fuel economy. The Toyota Corolla gets very good fuel economy but my tall frame also doesn’t fit in it so well. The Ford Focus has lost some of its grip and with it went braking distances and some of the fun-to-drive factor. The Focus’s driving position is decent for tall drivers but it has no rear headrests which is a serious safety omission. The VW Rabbit feels more solid and sporty than some here and has a good driving position for taller people.

All that being said, my favorite, though, is the Mini Cooper. Both the base and S models are a blast to drive, get very good fuel economy and surprisingly have a very good driving position for tall drivers. The back seat is petty much for storage or very small passengers, however. The Honda Fit has a versatile interior, a useable rear seat and good driving position for taller drivers; a new tilt-and-telescoping steering wheel really helps here. The manual shifter feels sporty. Fuel economy is very good--even with the automatic transmission--but if you want even more mpg, get the manual.

Tom Mutchler: True confession time: I had already written my Personal Pick for this group, the Honda Fit. I started out with a diatribe about the lack of ESC unless you get navigation, but then noted that the Fit was great fun to drive with a very clever interior.

But then I read a post on our expert forums by a Pontiac Vibe owner, suggesting that his car might be the best "budget car" over the Fit. Never mind that the Vibe is larger than the Fit and isn't really a subcompact, or that the MSRP of his Vibe 1.8-liter manual with air and power accessories is $18,630 compared to the $16,730 Fit Sport manual.

Let’s examine his idea. First, that price difference mostly dissolves with the Vibe’s incentives. You can likely buy that Vibe for a little over $17,000; you’ll probably pay list for the high-demand Fit. The Fit doesn't give you the Vibe’s standard ESC or a fold-flat front passenger seat or OnStar. (You do get iPod control and alloy wheels on the Fit Sport; the cheaper base Fit lacks cruise control.)

The Fit isn't exactly a ball of fire and the interior trim is on the cheap side - ditto for the Vibe. Neither is that quiet inside. We haven’t tested a Vibe 1.8-liter manual, but given that our Toyota Corolla manual got 32 mpg overall with the same engine, we’d expect the larger Vibe to get something less. Not quite up to the Fit Sport manual’s fuel economy, but probably still quite good.

Both have room for four and a spacious cargo area. The Vibe has long been reliable too--remember, it's basically a Toyota Matrix that costs less.

My heart still leans towards the spunky, fun-to-drive Fit (or a used Mazda 3s Touring); put simply, I wouldn't look forward towards hustling a Vibe down a twisty road. But logic says that a discounted Vibe is a fine alternative.