July 03, 2009

American Personal Picks: July 4th Edition

American.flag To celebrate the 4th of July, the Consumer Reports Autos team put together its patriotic personal picks focused on the American-brand models they would most like to own. Or, imagine that you’ve just accepted a new job with great pay and benefits, including a new car. However, you employer insists that it be an American-branded car. So we asked which one would you choose and why?

Car type and price were left wide open, giving the engineers and editors freedom to choose from the broad model pantheon from Chrysler, Ford, and General Motors. Interesting, many of the same vehicles were repeated throughout the picks.

Read on to see the red, white, and blue selections here, and comment below with your own choices this holiday weekend. For a more official take, see our post “Consumer Reports American Top Picks 2009.” 

Jeff Bartlett: For a practical choice, I would zero in on the Ford Fusion—A well-mannered, fuel-efficient sedan that is a terrific value and practical choice, made more appealing with its 2010 update. Beyond that, I see precious little from the Detroit 3 that would appeal to my below-$25,000 sensibilities. I favor a hatchback for versatility and prize personality. Not much meets that description from Detroit.

However, were gasoline once again cheap as water, the Chevrolet Camaro SS would be a slam dunk. It is a 30-year dream realized, almost. I have long wanted a first-gen Camaro reinvented with a modern chassis, powertrain, and safety features. But having driven it, I find I also want head room, rearward visibility, and more polished interior. Still, the new model drives as good as in my fantasy, looks stunning, and has terrific power. Should I trip over a lottery ticket or leprechaun, it would be a Corvette in the driveway, again. The Z06 and ZR1 deliver exotic-car performance in an all-American sports car, though I would choose the new Grand Sport version. The name alone conjures a legendary heritage. This special-edition has Z06 appearance elements and brakes, distinctive trim details, and a more-than-adequate 436-horsepower LS3 V8. Yeah, that’d be it.

David Champion: I would choose the Ford Fusion, Flex or Chevrolet Traverse. The Fusion’s top-notch reliability is a real breakthrough for a domestic brand and the car is fun to drive. The Flex is just the right size to carry either people or cargo—it’s comfortable and quiet and makes for a great road-trip vehicle. If I were in the market for a three-row SUV, the Traverse would be on my list for its ability to handle a variety of duties, plus its ride and handling are impressive for its size. But its sibling’s first-year reliability has been very disappointing.

Eric Evarts: If I could afford a $40,000 entry-level luxury sedan, there’s no better example on the market in my book than the new Cadillac CTS. It’s quicker than a BMW, handles as well, has more room inside, and looks wicked. While earlier CTS’s had cheesy-looking and poorly laid out interiors, the new one’s feels rich, and much warmer, more practical, and easy to use than European equivalents. Even better, I could get it with all-wheel-drive to get home from work up my hill in a snowstorm. (In fact, my neighbor did.) Even the automatic transmission that comes with the all-wheel-drive model is smooth, crisp, and responsive. So it doesn’t feel like a sacrifice.

But you don’t have to spend $40,000 to get a great American car. I prefer the new Chevrolet Malibu and the Ford Fusion to the Toyota Camry and the new Honda Accord, which both feel too big to me—even if I really like the VW Passat better than any of them.

Mike Leung: For me, I like the Cadillac CTS-V and Chevrolet Corvette. They’re stylish and fun to drive. Although the practical side of me would also go for the standard CTS, which is less fun to drive, but it has a very nice interior and is still quite stylish.

Tom Mutchler: A dream of mine is to get a 25-foot Airstream along with a pickup truck as a tow vehicle. Starting out with a smaller RV for now, I picked up a used T@B teardrop trailer, choosing our 2009 Chevrolet Silverado to go get it. We put 1,400 miles in three days on that truck and found it to be a comfortable and easy-to-live-with travel companion. Sure, a loaded Avalanche or a GMC Sierra Denali would be sweet, but a “modest” Silverado remains a very nice truck. I want one.

But a truck isn’t exactly what I want for a daily driver. Lots of domestic cars qualify. The Chevrolet Malibu is one of my favorite family sedans; I’d take a four-cylinder LT over the stiffer-riding LTZ. We found that the four-cylinder Malibu’s fuel economy beat the four-cylinder Accord and Camry in our tests, and I find the Malibu more stylish than the Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan. If I got a management job, maybe I could swing a Cadillac CTS—a very appealing sports sedan.

Finally, I’ve come very close—more than once—to buying a Ford SVT Contour or Focus. Both were tremendously satisfying driver’s cars. There isn’t really anything in Ford’s domestic fleet that currently qualifies, but I’m looking forward to the upcoming European-based Fords. Even the Transit Connect has steering feel that rivals some sports cars…

Mike Quincy: I’ve grown very fond of the new Dodge Ram pickup truck. It’s quieter inside than a congressional hearing on Wall Street bonuses. But the Ram’s open bed isn’t secure like the Chevrolet Avalanche’s – another truck I love. Tough call between these two. But these vehicles are all work, and I have to weigh in on stuff for play. The Chevrolet Corvette is often my answer to the question “If you could have ANY car, which one would it be?” Corvettes of various generations and horsepower ratings have accompanied me on trips from Boston to Washington, D.C. The combination of awesome power, secure handling and tolerable ride is amazing. I’ve often said that if GM put as much effort into the rest of its line as it so obviously has with the Corvette, it would rule the world. I’m also a big fan of the fun to drive Ford Mustang GT. I love its looks and distinctive V8 rumble, and I’ve enjoyed driving our recently acquired ’09 GT.

Gabe Shenhar: I think the Ford Fusion SEL V6 makes for a good family sedan. Even though it’s based on the previous-generation Mazda6 and is built in Mexico, it qualifies as American by most definitions. The Fusion steers and handles well with a nice ride. For a larger sedan, I’d take the Pontiac G8 GT. I love this car. With Euro-style ride, handling and braking and some rough-and-tumble American muscle, this Aussie import is exactly what the British would call a Q-car – an incognito fierce performance machine. If my budget allowed me to go more upscale, I’d be happy with a Cadillac CTS. This home-grown Detroiter looks gorgeous and drives almost as beautifully as a BMW 5 Series. And I personally think it steers better than an Infiniti G37. The larger Cadillac STS has even more comfort, quietness and roominess thrown in, yet is still a solid, enjoyable drive.

For SUVs, I’d look at the Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited 4.7, really one of Chrysler’s only worthy models. It has a character, looks and the off-road ability befitting a Jeep. And yet, it’s brisk and fairly capable on the road with some handling response and decent seats. For a model with three-row seating, I’d choose the Chevrolet Traverse. It’s roomy and drives well. This coach feels solid and quiet without being the Queen Mary II. And I prefer its looks over its three other siblings. In the absence of a domestic minivan, its functionally comes close to that most-efficient suburban vehicle.

Rick Small: I would buy a Ford Fusion, Flex or Edge. These models have a sportier feel than much of their competition and they’re attractive designs to boot. Discounting for these models is prevalent, so you can get a good deal. The Fusion and Edge are also reliable. Finally, Ford isn’t taking any bail out money (yet) which means the company should be around for awhile.

July 02, 2009

First drives of Consumer Reports’ latest vehicle purchases

At Consumer Reports we buy, anonymously, all the cars we test, about 80 per year, and put thousands of miles on each of them. So, we are constantly at dealerships buying new vehicles to put through our exhaustive test program consisting of more than 50 tests. As vehicles start the evaluation process, we share our initial, raw impressions through the "Logbook" posts on this blog. When vehicles start the test process, we provide initial First Drive reports on popular models before their road tests are completed.

The most recent First Drives include the Dodge Challenger, Ford Fusion and Fusion hybrid, Hyundai Genesis Coupe, Nissan Cube, Nissan 370Z, and Volvo XC60. The full tests of all these vehicles will be published in the coming months.

Dodge Challenger: The classic muscle car is reborn into a powerful cruiser, but faces stiff competition from the revived Chevrolet Camaro and freshened Ford Mustang. Read the complete First drive.

Ford Fusion/Fusion hybrid: The Fusion is well-rounded and enjoyable to drive and is now fully competitive with the best family sedans. Read the complete First Drive.

Hyundai Genesis Coupe: This new coupe is eye-catching and generously equipped with an affordable sticker price, but the manual transmission is not up to par. Read the complete First Drive.

Nissan Cube: This boxy wagon has abundant interior room and great fuel economy for a low price. Read the complete First Drive.

Nissan 370Z: The Z is a true sports car with precise handling and fun-to-drive appeal, but the ride is stiff and road noise loud. Read the complete First Drive.

Volvo XC60: The XC60 luxury SUV is a pleasant vehicle, which showcases the latest safety advances, but it’s not as exciting to drive as it’s competitors. Read the complete First Drive.

We add new First Drives to ConsumerReports.org on a regular basis. These can be found on our First Drives hub linked on the main Cars page and secondary New Cars page. First looks can also be found in the model overview pages (available to online subscribers) until they are replaced with a final road test.

--Liza Barth

June 23, 2009

Auto news highlights – June 23, 2009

Newspaper2010 Buick LaCrosse gets four-cylinder engine
Times are a changing. A direct-injection four-cylinder engine will join a 255-hp, 3.0-liter V6 and 280-hp, 3.6-liter V6 later this calendar year. The new 2.4-liter base engine will produce 182 horsepower. Matched with a six-speed automatic transmission, GM estimates it will enable the luxurious sedan to achieve 20 mpg city, 30 mpg highway. [Consumer Reports New Car Preview]

Ford, Nissan, and Tesla receive billions in green tech loans
The federal government set aside $25 billion to advance green automotive technologies, and today it was announced that Ford, Nissan, and Tesla would receive significant loans from this fund. Chrysler and General Motors had previous requests denied, due to their financial situations. Ford will receive $5.9 billion, Nissan $1.6 billion, and Tesla $465 million in advanced technology financing from the Energy Department program. [Reuters]

GM asked to recall 2000-01 model year after trunk deaths
Kids and Cars has asked General Motors recall 2000-01 model year  sedans after two children perish in locked trunk. These cars were made before trunk-release latches became standard equipment. An aftermarket retrofit kit called the Quick-Out Emergency Trunk Release is available for $18 for installation in older cars. [Consumer Reports Safety Blog, Consumer Reports Kids and Car Safety hub]

Mini to expand dealer network
Mini USA announced that it will expand its 83-store network by 17 dealerships over the next year and a half. Mini has been well placed to serve increased consumer demand for fuel-efficient cars. New locations are expected in the following cities: Birmingham, Alabama; Pensacola, Florida; Alexandria, Virginia; Austin, Texas; Seattle, Washington; Fort Myers, Florida; El Paso, Texas; Ontario, California; Louisville, Kentucky; Raleigh, North Carolina; Knoxville, Tennessee; Loveland, Colorado; Madison, Wisconsin; Mount Laurel, New Jersey; Allentown, Pennsylvania; San Diego, California and Tempe, Arizona. [Mini, AutoBlog]

No improvement seen for rear seat belt use
Rear seat belt use in the U.S. remains statistically unchanged at 74 percent for 2008 compared to 76 percent in 2007 according to the National Highway Transportation Administration.  Belt use in the rear seats is lower than the front seats, which is at 83 percent. The survey found belt use in rear seats is higher in states that have laws for belt use in all seats. [NHTSA, Consumer Reports]

New Jersey to ban GPS operation while driving
In a move to reduce driver distraction, Democratic State Assemblyman L. Harvey Smith has introduced a bill to “prohibit the manual operation of a global positioning system (GPS) device or similar navigation device by the operator of a moving motor vehicle,” according to Fox News. The legislation is the first of its kind, and the vote will have an important impact on how millions of drivers use these popular devices. [Fox News]

Legislation introduced to create teen driving standards
Some House of Representative members have introduced legislation that would set minimum standards for teen driving in order to reduce death and injuries; automobile crashes are the leading cause of deaths of teens in the U.S. The legislation would act as an incentive with rewards of funding for states that enact graduated driver licensing laws (GDL). Those states that don’t comply will have federal funding withheld. The GDL program will provide a three-stage licensing program, restrictions on night driving and restrictions against driving with more than one other person under 21 during the first two stages. [House, IIHS]

June 22, 2009

Car brands: Who owns what?

2011-Jeep-Grand-Cherokee The auto industry is very complicated these days, with constant change across all corners of the globe. The worldwide economic slowdown dictates widespread cost reductions, inspiring partnerships and changes in ownership. Further confusing the scene are past commitments between companies: For example, the new 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is based on a Mercedes-Benz platform–even though Chrysler and Mercedes are no longer joined at the hip.

To help clear up some of the confusion, here is a road map to navigate who owns what brands among the major companies that sell in the U.S. car market.

BMW owns: BMW, Mini, and Rolls Royce

Fiat owns: Alfa Romeo, Ferrari, Fiat, Lancia, Maserati; Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep–20-percent stake

Ford Motor Company owns: Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Volvo (for now), and still owns 13.4 percent of Mazda

General Motors owns: Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GMC. Also owns a controlling interest in Daewoo, as well as Opel and Vauxhall in Europe and Holden in Australia. (Pontiac to be discontinued)

Honda owns: Honda, Acura

Hyundai owns: Hyundai, Kia

Tata Motors (India) owns: Jaguar and Land Rover

Mazda (partially owned by Ford)

Mitsubishi

Daimler AG owns: Mercedes-Benz and Smart

Nissan owns: Nissan and Infiniti (Nissan is owned by Renault--France)

Porsche owns: Porsche and a majority share in Volkswagen

Subaru (A controlling interest of Subaru is owned by Toyota)

Suzuki

Toyota Motor Company owns: Lexus, Toyota, Scion, Daihatsu and Hino Motors, with a stake in Fuji Industries (Subaru’s parent company) and Isuzu

Volkswagen owns: Audi, Volkswagen, Bentley, Bugatti, Lamborghini, and overseas SEAT and Skoda.

In formal negotiations to be sold:
Hummer: Tengzhong (China)
Saturn: Penske Automotive Group
Saab: Koenigsegg (Sweden)

--Liza Barth

June 18, 2009

Auto news highlights – June 18, 2009

Newspaper Chinese automaker to buy Volvo
Ford has been right-sizing its corporate portfolio since long before it was fashionable. Aston Martin, Jaguar, and Land Rover have all found new international owners. Now, there are reports that Chinese automaker Geely has signed a deal to purchase Volvo. No formal announcement has been made. [Autocar, The Car Connection]

New auto company to use old GM plant
Backed by investor T. Boone Pickens, V-Vehicle Co. will assemble cars at a former General Motors plant in Louisiana. The project is expected to create over 1,400 direct jobs at an average annual salary of nearly $40,000, plus benefits. VVC will receive a state incentive package worth approximately $67 million. Pickens has been a vocal advocate of wind power and natural gas, suggesting these may be alternative-fueled cars. [Automotive News, Louisiana Economic Development]

Pontiac Vibe production ends in August
The Vibe had been expected to live on as the sole survivor after GM cuts off the Pontiac division, but the company today announced production would cease this August. GM is in talks with Toyota for other uses for the New United Motor Manufacturing Incorporated (NUMMI) facility jointly operated in Fremont, California. The Vibe is the only Pontiac vehicle that is Consumer Reports recommended. [GM]

Chrysler to resume car production
Chrysler had idled its plants as it entered bankruptcy proceedings, immediately reducing costs and vehicle inventory. Now, the new, leaner Chrysler is firing up the factories. First to start was the Conner Avenue Assembly Plant that builds the Dodge Viper, beginning on June 15. The week of June 29th, seven production factories will begin churning out higher-volume Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep models. (Read: "What the post-bankruptcy Chrysler means to you") [CNN, Chrysler]

Cash for clunkers moves closer to law
The “cash for clunkers” program narrowly escaped Senate today, remaining as part of the approved $106 billion war-funding bill. The House approved the bill earlier in the week, and it is now awaiting President Obama’s signature. [AP, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post]

Turn signals: amber vs. red
A new report from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [NHTSA] has found that amber rear turn signals are 5.3 percent more effective than red signals in reducing crashes. The real-world study looked at rear-end crashes where the front vehicle was in the act of turning, merging, changing lanes, or pulling in or out of a parking lot.  [NHTSA]

June 17, 2009

Move over McCain, what would Captain America drive?

Capt-America-Car In the daily news overload, with 1s and 0s streaming from myriad, disparate sources, two things struck me on the same day this week:

  • Marvel Comics announced that the original Captain America, Steve Rogers, would be resurrected and returned to his namesake comic book. (See video.)
  • Senator John McCain declared that he was buying a Ford Fusion hybrid on Twitter.

Clearly, McCain is sending a signal with his latest purchase, taking the prized pole position in his vehicle fleet away from his coveted Cadillac CTS, according to the Associated Press.

A patriot, McCain is buying American, though his brand choice is telling. The Senator had voted against providing money to Chrysler and General Motors back in December, according to the Detroit Free Press, and he apparently doesn’t want to give them any of his own earnings now.

McCain isn’t alone in moving to Ford. President Obama replaced his trendy-but-thirsty Chrysler 300C with a politically correct Ford Escape hybrid just in time to freshen his image for the presidential campaign.

Last month, Ford Motor Company saw its sales drop just 24 percent from May 2008 to May 2009, compared with 30 percent for GM and 47 percent for Chrysler, according to AutoBlog. Like these politicians, consumers have made similar moves during this tumultuous time, though possibly for other reasons.

I’m left with mixed feelings about these vehicle choices. What do you think these or other politicians should drive? Without political aspirations, though with an eye on a Hollywood career, Captain America could exercise the freedom he has fought for since World War II in choosing a car. Perhaps the bigger question is, what would the Captain choose?

Jeff Bartlett

June 04, 2009

Signs of life: American auto sales are stronger than expected

May-Car-salesBy all rights, May could have been a disastrous month for Chrysler and General Motors sales as the companies publicly struggle through restructuring and bankruptcy proceedings, but that was not the case. May sales numbers were surprisingly strong for the American automakers, giving new hope for the future. Even still, the industry still faces clear challenges in the troubled economy.

An increase in consumer confidence, plus offers of incentives and rebates, helped Chrysler, Ford, and GM achieve their highest monthly sales so far in 2009. Ford outsold Toyota for the second month in a row and GM sales were relatively, as well. The two top-selling vehicles in America were the Ford F-150 and the Chevrolet Silverado. The Toyota Camry came in at a close third.

  • Chrysler’s bankruptcy didn’t have much negative effect on their sales numbers either with Chrysler vehicles seeing an increase of 32 percent, 23 percent for Dodge, and 21 percent for Jeep.
  • Record sales of the Fusion, Ford Flex, and the company’s hybrid vehicles helped Ford increase their numbers by 20 percent in May.
  • Even with GM’s pre-bankruptcy struggles, it still achieved an 11 percent increase.
  • Toyota also had a strong performance, gaining 20 percent.
  • However, Honda sales were down almost three percent from April to May.

    Compared to last year, sales of both Toyota and Honda vehicles were down 39 percent, but as Honda noted in a press release, May 2008 was its best sales month ever. This was mostly due to last year’s high gas prices and consumers buying small fuel-efficient cars at a rapid pace. Both Honda and Toyota’s lineup were well positioned last year to respond to the high fuel costs, thus they saw a surge in sales. GM, Ford, and Chrysler didn’t have the small cars to compete and their numbers don’t reflect such a large decrease from last year in comparison.

    The trouble in the auto industry is not just saved for the American automakers. Across the board, all manufacturers are seeing a down year with dismal sales, but the latest figures do show signs of hope.

    Surveys conducted by CNW Research in January and repeated in May show a significant change in the attitude among new car intenders who are considering a domestic-brand vehicle. Initially, about half of the interviewed consumers said they would not buy from Ford or GM if they were in bankruptcy with a federal bailout, with a higher 59 percent stating they wouldn’t purchase from Chrysler. (Ford never requested federal assistance.) Those who would not buy without a bailout saw percentages climb to 86 to 91, depending on brand.

    In contrast, the May CNW survey finds consumers were more willing to purchase from companies in bankruptcy with a bailout. (Percentages of those who would not buy: Chrysler 43, Ford 20, and GM 37.) Despite the prognostications, consumers became more comfortable with the thought of buying from a company undergoing bankruptcy proceedings. While there are myriad factors at play, including incentives and fire sales, at the core, it seems to be consumer confidence in the company and that it would continue to be there was a key factor in the recent sales uptick.

    A number of sales offers and incentive programs are continuing for the month of June to help lure customers into dealerships. (See our Best new car deals for details). We’ll see if next month continues this upward trend and brings more hope to the ailing auto industry.

    Liza Barth
  • May 29, 2009

    What do the automakers have against their dealers?

    GM.dealership All three domestic manufacturers have been ending franchise agreements and effectively closing dealers. In particular, Chrysler and General Motors have been making headlines for their massive shutdowns, while Ford has been quietly negotiating closures for the last four years.

    Chrysler Vice-chairman Jim Press has said that Chrysler’s bankruptcy allows a “once in a lifetime chance to accomplish a right-sized, realigned dealer body.” It seems sensible to ask, then, why any automaker wants to choke off parts of its own distribution channel. After all, the dealers are independent businesses. Since the automakers don’t own the stores, why should they really care if some of them are losing money?

    The answer, it turns out, has more to do with long-term business strategy than with an immediate crucial need. Turnover lies at the heart of the problem. Ideally, both dealers and automakers want the maximum volume possible to go through every store. High-volume stores have a rapid sales rate, and product turnover multiplies whatever slender profit they make on each car sold.

    With the Detroit Three’s declining market share, these diminished corporate giants find themselves with too many dealers and not enough customers to support them all. Consequently, unsold cars pile up on dealer lots. Those unsold cars tie up capital that could be used productively elsewhere. The current deep recession only magnifies the problem.

    Automakers may provide life-support for low-volume dealers in the form of special discounts or other financial help. They also maintain a network of field representatives and other employees devoted to serving the dealers. All those costs impact an automaker’s net earnings. Making a better match between the volume of cars they produce and the number of stores needed to sell them should result in corporate savings and a healthier dealer group. In the end, it’s not that automakers will earn more per car, it’s that they will spend less trying to sell them.

    Another consequence of a dealership glut is that those stores compete against each other for whatever customers are available in any given region. And consumers are pretty good at figuring out which dealer has the lowest price. Anybody who has bargained hard for a new car in the last few years knows how effective it is to get up and make for the door if the dealer doesn’t seem interested in offering a good deal.

    How dealership closings affect the consumer?

    In some ways, it’s good for the consumer when the dealers are willing to battle each other to sell you a car. And with multiple dealers fighting for your business, that’s what can happen. Such competition can inspire some dealers to resort to high-pressure selling of dubious add-ons like extended warranties, VIN-etching, and absurdly high “conveyance” fees. Then again, dealers shutting their doors can be a real inconvenience. Much of the time, inconvenience is all it will be. If your local Ford or Chevrolet or Chrysler dealer closes, there is often another one 10 or 15 miles up the road, or on the other side of town. For those in more rural areas, the dealer proximity may be a much more significant issue.

    The new landscape promises to be a mixed blessing. For instance, you may have to travel further to get your car serviced. However, fewer, stronger dealerships in theory can provide more inventory to choose from and have the resources to provide better facilities and services.

    But if you have had five Chevrolet, Dodge, or Ford dealers in your area and now suddenly you have just one, what’s to prevent those survivors from jacking up prices?

    The answer is that they can try, but only to a degree. However optimistic some car dealers may be, they can’t just raise their prices at will because they still have to compete with other brands. The three domestic automakers will remain rivals, plus they face seven Japanese, one Korean, and about a half dozen European makers, and their assorted brands. So, however grandiose Detroit Three dealers’ dreams may be, the hard reality is that in practically every car category consumers still have lots of worthy alternatives. If you don’t like the deal you’re offered, forget about brand loyalty and head for the door.

    The bottom line

    Dealer cutbacks are tough on local communities and their economies, though they remain an important element in restructuring the struggling domestic automakers. Hopefully, the long-term benefits outweigh the current challenges and impositions.

    We will continue to monitor this fast-moving story, reporting here in the Cars blog and also updating advice and news on the Auto Crisis hub.

    --Gordon Hard

    May 21, 2009

    Top 40 Best Deals on American-Made Cars

    Memorial-Day-Deals-FlagMemorial Day is a time to commemorate the sacrifices made by men and women to protect our freedoms and values. It is a time to rally around the flag, with picnics, parades, and yes, car sales. In the patriotic spirit, our Auto Price Services team has studied the market and compiled these best deals on American-made cars for the holiday weekend.

    Made in America
    Buying an American-made car puts a new car in your driveway, and it also stimulates the economy from the automaker down through the parts suppliers, factory workers, and neighborhood dealerships. Given the recent announcements from Chrysler and General Motors that they will be making drastic cuts in the number of franchised dealerships, there will now be a greater drive than ever for these stores to make a deal. Likewise, their competitors will also offer significant discounts.

    As is the case with our Best New Car Deals, to make this list, a vehicle must meet our stringent requirements to be recommended. Specifically, the vehicle must have performed well in Consumer Reports' tests, have average or better reliability, and, if crash-tested, provide good overall safety. Vehicles also must not have tipped up in the government rollover test.

    To truly judge the deals, we factored customer rebates as well as hidden dealer incentives, as available in our new car price reports. From a list of all discounted models, we whittled it down to the 40 American-made models that meet our recommended criteria and offered the greatest discounts.

    The list showcases a diverse assortment of 11 brands, reflecting the global nature of the auto industry and the reality that most companies build cars in the United States. (Conversely, many models from Chrysler, Ford, and GM are imported from other countries.)

    While pro-America motives may fuel your purchase, be sure to research the models that best suit your needs and budgets, weighing the potential risks in choosing from a brand in bankruptcy proceedings or being divested, such as Hummer, Pontiac, Saab, and Saturn. Tremendous up-front savings can be overshadowed by excessive depreciation unless you plan on keeping the car longer than five years. There also may be limited dealer access.

    Regardless of the model that catches your eye from this list, buying these models will help keep America working and put you behind the wheel of a good car.

    Make & model Expires MSRP Invoice price Customer rebate Dealer incentive Bottom line price Potential savings below MSRP
    2009 Nissan Titan SE 4X4 Crew Cab SWB
    6/1/2009
    $33,200
    $30,061
    Yes
    No Get the Bottom Line Price
    25%+
    2009 Ford Focus SES Sedan
    6/30/2009 17,865
    16,552
    Yes
    No Get the Bottom Line Price
    20%+
    2009 Ford Focus SES Coupe
    6/30/2009
    17,865
    16,552
    Yes
    No Get the Bottom Line Price
    20%+
    2009 Nissan Armada LE 4X4
    6/1/2009 47,860
    43,562
    Yes
    No Get the Bottom Line Price
    20%+
    2009 Ford Mustang GT Premium Coupe
    6/1/2009 29,160
    26,734
    Yes
    No Get the Bottom Line Price
    20%+
    2009 Ford Mustang V6 Premium Convertible
    6/1/2009 27,345
    25,100
    Yes
    No Get the Bottom Line Price
    20%+
    2009 Ford F-150
    XLT 4x4 SuperCrew 157-in.
    6/1/2009 34,760
    31,303
    Yes
    No Get the Bottom Line Price
    20%+
    2009 Ford Escape XLT 2.5L 4WD
    6/30/2009 25,205
    23,381
    Yes
    No Get the Bottom Line Price
    15%+
    2009 Honda Odyssey EX 6/1/2009 29,455
    26,692
    No
    Yes Get the Bottom Line Price
    15%+
    2009 Mercury Sable Premier
    6/30/2009 29,380
    26,917
    Yes
    No Get the Bottom Line Price
    15%+
    2009 Ford Escape XLT 3.0L 4WD
    6/30/2009 26,215
    24,300
    Yes
    No Get the Bottom Line Price
    15%+
    2009 Ford Taurus Limited FWD
    6/30/2009 30,670
    28,053
    Yes
    No Get the Bottom Line Price
    15%+
    2009 Mercury Mariner Premier I4 4WD
    6/30/2009 26,515
    24,598
    Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price
    15%+
    2009 Honda Ridgeline 3.5 Auto RTS
    6/1/2009 31,305
    28,363
    No
    Yes Get the Bottom Line Price
    15%+
    2009 Nissan Frontier 4.0 LE Crew Cab 4X4 AT
    6/1/2009 29,190
    27,045
    Yes
    No Get the Bottom Line Price
    15%+
    2009 Mercury Mariner Premier V6 4WD
    6/30/2009 27,515
    25,508
    Yes
    No Get the Bottom Line Price
    15%+
    2009 Toyota Tundra 5.7 Auto 4WD SR5 Crew Max
    6/1/2009
    34,285
    31,369
    Yes
    No Get the Bottom Line Price
    15%+
    2009 Ford Taurus X Limited AWD
    6/30/2009 34,175
    31,272
    Yes
    No Get the Bottom Line Price
    15%+
    2009 Toyota Camry 2.4 Auto Hybrid
    6/1/2009 26,150
    23,796
    Yes
    No Get the Bottom Line Price
    15%+
    2009 Toyota Camry 2.4 Auto SE
    6/1/2009 22,815
    20,533
    Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price 15%+
    2009 Toyota Camry 2.4 Auto LE 6/1/2009 21,650 19,593 Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price 15%+
    2009 Lincoln Navigator Luxury 4x4 6/1/2009 56,020 51,383 Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price 15%+
    2009 Ford Expedition Eddie Bauer 4x4 EL 6/30/2009 45,730 41,628 Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price 15%+
    2009 Subaru Outback 2.5 Auto I 6/1/2009 23,295 21,907 Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price 15%+
    2009 Toyota Camry 3.5 Auto V6 XLE 6/1/2009 28,695 25,823 Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price 15%+
    2009 Hyundai Sonata GLS I4 6/1/2009 18,700 17,922 Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price 15%+
    2009 Subaru Tribeca Limited 5-Passenger 6/1/2009 32,595 30,727 Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price 15%+
    2009 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 1LT 4X4 Crew Cab 6/1/2009 34,295 31,723 Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price 15%+
    2009 Mazda Tribute 2.5 Auto i Grand Touring 4WD 6/1/2009 26,375 24,681 Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price 15%+
    2009 Subaru Outback 3.0R Limited w/Navigation Auto 4WD 6/1/2009 34,095 31,721 Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price 15%+
    2009 Honda Accord 2.4 LX-P 6/1/2009 21,905 19,869 No Yes Get the Bottom Line Price 15%+
    2009 Honda Pilot
    EX-L 4WD
    6/1/2009 35,295 31,969 No Yes Get the Bottom Line Price 15%+
    2009 Mazda Tribute 3.0 Auto S Grand Touring 4WD 6/1/2009 27,635 25,856 Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price 15%+
    2009 Honda Accord 2.4 LX-P 5AT 6/1/2009 22,705 20,592 No Yes Get the Bottom Line Price 15%+
    2009 Nissan Altima 2.5 HEV Auto 6/1/2009 26,650 24,976 Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price 15%+
    2009 GMC Sierra 4WD Crew Cab SLT SWB 6/1/2009 41,855 38,716 Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price 10%+
    2009 Hyundai Sonata GLS V6 A/T 6/1/2009 22,450 21,466 Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price 10%+
    2009 Nissan Altima 2.5 S Sedan 6/1/2009 21,040 19,728 Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price 10%+
    2009 Nissan Altima 3.5 SE Auto Sedan 6/1/2009 25,680 23,800 Yes No Get the Bottom Line Price 10%+
    2009 Honda Accord 3.5 EX-L V6 5AT 6/1/2009 28,955 26,240 No Yes Get the Bottom Line Price 10%+

    Jeff Bartlett and Michael Dempsey


     

    May 20, 2009

    Recalls: Cadillac, Chevrolet, Dodge , Ford and GMC vehicles

    2009-Dodge-Ram-1500 There have been a number of announced recalled the past few weeks that affect Dodge Rams, Ford F-150’s, Chevrolet Traverse’s, and a number of Cadillac, Chevrolet and GM SUVs. If your vehicle is listed here, the manufacturer will contact you with information about what to do, or you can use one of the numbers we list below to contact the manufacturer yourself.

    2009 Ford F-150

    Ford is recalling over 8,700 Ford F-150 trucks due to a problem with the break stop light not illuminating or delayed when brake pedal is depressed. The delay or loss of the light function may increase the risk of an accident. Dealers will inspect the lamp and reinstall it after the proper adjustment. Work will be done free of charge.

    Owners may contact Ford at 1-866-436-7332 or at www.ownerconnect.com.

    2009 Chevrolet Traverse

    GM is recalling over 15,000 Chevrolet traverse SUVs for a problem with the park brake cable link. The connector may fracture when the brake pedal is depressed and could result in a crash.

    Dealers will replace the park brake cable link free of charge. Owners will be notified via mail, but can also contact Chevrolet at 1-800-630-4236 or at www.gmownercenter.com.

    2009 Dodge Ram

    Chrysler is recalling over 37,000 Dodge Ram pickup trucks due to a problem with the manual temperature control, which can cause the windshield defrosting and defogging functions to not work. This can decrease a driver’s visibility and result in a crash. Dealers will reprogram the HVAC module free of charge.

    Owners may contact Chrysler at 1-800-835-1403.

    2009 Cadillac , Chevrolet and GM vehicles

    GM is recalling over 27,000 Cadillac Escalade and Escalade Hybrid, ESV and EXT versions, Chevrolet Avalanche, Colorado, Suburban, Tahoe and Tahoe hybrid and GMC Canyon, Yukon, Yukon XL, and Yukon hybrid trucks. The fuel system could have a sealing problem that may cause separation and may allow water to seep in.

    The water could cause a short, set off a check engine light or diagnostic code or engine may not start, which could increase the risk for a crash.

    Dealers will install a new fuel system control module free of charge. Owners may contact Cadillac at 1-866-982-2339, Chevrolet at 1-800-630-2438 and GMC at 1-866-966-9463 or www.gmownercenter.com.

    About this blog

    Consumer Reports' cars reporters, editors, and testers will quickly report on new developments and trends.

    Consumer Reports Cars Blog Categories

    Consumer Reports Cars Blog Archives

    -    July 2009
    -    June 2009
    -    May 2009
    -    April 2009
    »    View All