May 09, 2008

Arnold to automakers: Stop whining!

Arnolde85tahoecalifornia In the ongoing battle over CO2 emissions limits in California, a group of car company executives from the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers recently met with Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to plead their case. They say the state should drop its proposed limits on carbon-dioxide emissions, which would effectively require cars to get better fuel economy. Since the federal government recently established higher fuel economy regulations, requiring cars to average 31.6 mpg by 2015, they say the California mandate is unnecessary and would result in a patchwork of fuel economy regulations across the nation.

However, legally, there could be no "patchwork" of regulations, since California is the only state allowed under federal law to pass its own emissions standards. (Other states can follow either California’s standards or the federal ones, but not set their own.)

American automakers have never been known for their enthusiasm for improving fuel economy. Even the outspoken Vice Chairman of Global Product Development at GM, Bob Lutz, has said, "There has been this perception that Ford, GM, and Chrysler are not forthcoming with new technology."

After meeting with the automakers, the Governator still wasn’t buying their long-held arguments. He told them, "The train has left the station," according to an Associated Press report.

Then the muscle-bound governor got tough, saying, "While you’re whining, you should be creating new technologies. That’s how you meet the date."

Ouch.

Do you think automakers are dragging their feet on improving fuel efficiency? Or are they right to resist increasingly stringent fuel economy standards? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Eric Evarts

Read: Gov. Schwarzenegger's official statement

April 10, 2008

Midsized sedan crash tests - front, side looking good

Dodgeavengercrashtest In the latest crash tests from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), all seven midsized sedans provide good frontal crash protection and six provide good side-impact protection. However, results for the rear tests were mixed, with only the Kia Optima earning a good rating. With its latest report, the Institute notes that there has been a marked improvement in side-crash performance for midsized sedans, but it appears more can be done to protect passengers from possible whiplash injuries from rear-end collisions.

As we wrote in "Many cars don't protect against whiplash injuries": "A rear-end crash occurs every 17 seconds in the U.S. But a surprising number of vehicles offer inadequate protection from the whiplash injuries that can result, according to crash-test data and our own analysis."

Kiaoptimasidecrashtest This is again proven true with the latest test results from the IIHS, in which five of the seven vehicles tested earned marginal or poor ratings for rear-crash protection. Because rear crashes are rarely fatal, and the IIHS rear tests relatively new, Consumer Reports does not currently use them as a prerequisite for recommending a vehicle.

The good news with this test group is that vehicles are indeed improving, with better designs and increased safety equipment enabling them to more effectively protect occupants in the high-risk front and side collisions. As always, do check safety ratings before making a vehicle purchase. 

Midsized sedans
The April crash-test group from IIHS is listed below in rank order, with the specific air bag configuration tested and applicable model years listed. See how these vehicles perform in the crash test videos.

Dodge Avenger / Chrysler Sebring
Front - Good; Side - Good; Rear - Acceptable

With front and rear head-curtain air bags and front torso air bags.
Front, side, and rear: 2008 Avenger, 2007-2008 Sebring

Infiniti G35
Front - Good; Side - Good; Rear - Marginal

With front and rear head-curtain air bags and front torso air bags.
Front, side, and rear: 2007-2008 models

Nissan Altima
Front - Good; Side - Good; Rear - Marginal

With front and rear head-curtain air bags and front torso air bags.
Front, side, and rear: 2007-2008 models

Chevrolet Malibu
Front - Good; Side - Good; Rear - Marginal

With front and rear head-curtain air bags and front torso air bags.
Front and rear: 2008 models. Side: 2008 models built after February 2008.

Saturn Aura
Front - Good; Side - Good; Rear - Marginal

With front and rear head-curtain air bags and front torso air bags.
Front, side, and rear: 2007-2008 models

Mitsubishi Galant
Front - Good; Side - Good; Rear - Poor

With front and rear head-curtain air bags and front torso air bags.
Front and rear: 2004-2008 models. Side: 2007-2008 models.

Kia Optima
Front - Good; Side - Acceptable; Rear - Good

With front and rear head-curtain air bags and front torso air bags.
Front and rear: 2006-2008 models. Built after September 2005.
Side: 2006-2008 models. Built after June 2006.

See how these sedans and more than 200 other models perform in the crash test videos.

Jeff Bartlett

March 20, 2008

Plugged in: Chevrolet Volt

Chevroletvoltf General Motors' development of the Chevrolet Volt has been conducted with unprecedented publicity for the company. In fact, it has had so much publicity that it has led some skeptics to believe the program is a mere publicity stunt. Given that the American industry needs more good news for multiple reasons, this theory is alluring. Either way, we keep learning more about the GM program at almost every auto show and on many occasions in between.

At a "town hall" meeting with Volt enthusiasts in New York, the company spelled out many more details about its targets for the production car. Here's what we learned:

  • It will definitely be a small, four-door hatchback based on GM's global small-car architecture, as the concept car is, and it will be built on an existing assembly line.
  • The car will likely be low-slung and narrow, because aerodynamics will be important to achieving the targeted fuel economy. Seats will "fit like a tailored suit, not a bulky winter coat," says the Volt's Chief Engineer Andrew Farah.
  • The car's lithium-ion battery pack will have 16 kilowatt/hours of capacity - the amount necessary to travel 40 miles on an electric charge.
  • The car will have an "intelligent" on-board battery charger that can automatically charge from any type of typical household electric current - either 110-volt or 220-volt AC.
  • The battery pack will consist of 250 individual cells, wired in series. If any one of them fails, the whole pack will be dead. The pack will be liquid-cooled.
  • Those batteries will use one of two technologies: lithium-ion nano-phosphate batteries from A123 systems in Massachusetts, or lithium-ion magnesium batteries from LG Chem. Neither technology was used in the lithium batteries that exploded spontaneously in laptop computers. Although lithium battery technology is advancing, GM has frozen this technology for the first-generation Volt to meet its November 2010 production target.
  • GM is targeting an acceleration time from 0 to 60 mph of between 7 and 9 seconds, similar to the range of most family sedans today.
  • The Volt will initially be sold only in certain states or cities, but will roll out nationwide "within months" after that.

A few guests at the meeting last night asked what will take the company so long to develop batteries for the Volt.

In addition to developing software to tell the engine when to start in any of thousands of different situations and how fast to run it, figuring out how to deal with stale gas and oil if users don't drive far enough to start the engine, and testing full-size battery packs, GM expects it will take time to develop public knowledge of how to operate the Volt.

Voltboblutz For example, teaching consumers how often they should expect to recharge the car and to fill it with gas, and working with power companies to ensure that Volt buyers get discounted off-peak electric rates for charging at night. Currently, there is no EPA protocol for measuring the fuel economy of a plug-in hybrid.

Bob Lutz, General Motors vice president of global product development, says he is 94 percent positive GM will meet its target deadline of November 2010 to introduce the Volt. Then again, Bob is known for bluster. One thing is more and more certain: If the Volt turns into a mere publicity stunt, it will likely be the most elaborate and expensive one in history.

Eric Evarts

See the 2008 New York auto show coverage.

February 29, 2008

Consumer Reports' Top Picks 2008

Mazdamx5miatatoppick This year's Top Picks in 10 categories include four new models. For the first time since 2005, a U.S. model, the redesigned Chevrolet Silverado, made the list as our choice in pickup trucks. And for the first time ever, a South Korean automaker is represented: The Hyundai Elantra SE and Santa Fe are our top small sedan and midsized SUV, respectively. The fourth new entry is the Lexus LS 460L, the highest-scoring vehicle we've tested and best among luxury sedans.

Choosing the Top Picks
Our Top Picks are the most well-rounded models in their categories. Each must meet these stringent requirements:

  • Road tests: Each Top Pick scores at or near the top of its category among more than 260 vehicles we've recently tested at our Auto Test Center.
  • Reliability: Each has an average or better predicted-reliability Rating, based on the problems subscribers reported on almost 1.3 million vehicles in our Annual Car Reliability Survey.
  • Safety: Top Picks have performed adequately in overall safety if tested by the government or the insurance industry. Starting this year, they also must provide a critical safety feature, electronic stability control (ESC), either as standard equipment or as a readily available option. That's why the Honda Accord, for example, is the Top Pick in family sedans over the Nissan Altima. The Altima scored slightly higher in CR's testing, but offers ESC only as a pricey option on the V6 and standard on the hybrid model.

"All the vehicles in Consumer Reports' Top Picks list are standouts for performance, versatility, reliability, and safety," says David Champion, senior director of automotive testing, Consumer Reports. "CR's Top Picks list is a great place for consumers to start when they're looking for a new car."

Consumer Reports' testing procedures are the most comprehensive of any U.S. publication or Web site. More than 50 individual tests are performed on every vehicle, including evaluations of braking, handling, comfort, convenience, safety, and fuel economy. Around 6,000 miles of general driving and evaluations are racked up on each test car during the testing process.

Here, by category, are the Top Picks:

Green car - Toyota Prius
Small sedan - Hyundai Elantra SE
Family sedan - Honda Accord
Upscale sedan - Infiniti G35
Luxury sedan - Lexus LS 460L
Fun to drive - Mazda MX-5 Miata
Small SUV - Toyota RAV4
Midsized SUV - Hyundai Santa Fe
Minivan - Toyota Sienna
Pickup truck - Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Crew Cab

Read the full story and watch the Top Picks videos.

Consumer Reports' Annual April Auto Issue is on sale from March 4 through June 4, and it is available wherever magazines are sold. Visit the April Auto Issue special section.

February 22, 2008

Dear Chevrolet Travers(e) - Welcome to the family

ChevrolettraversbadgeI'd like to take a moment to thank the good people of Chevrolet for naming their latest SUV after me. I'm deeply moved. Really.

I'm so moved I hate to have to point out a couple of problems, but here goes: The first is, as some of you know, employees of Consumer Reports cannot accept gifts from manufacturers—not even small ones. However, given that the Traverse is a clear tribute to my paternal name, it does feel like a gift and it creates an ethical quandary. The second thing is, they spelled my name with one "e" too many. (A clear sign of excess budget.) For the record, it is "T-r-a-v-e-r-s."

Still, it's the thought that counts. And making it all the more of an honor, the Chevy SUV is based on the excellent Buick Enclave and Saturn Outlook, which scored highly enough in our ratings to become our highest ranked recommended large SUVs. I trust our ranking didn't have anything to do with Chevy naming their version after me, but still, it would be more comfortable having my name pasted on the flanks of this thing than say the Chevy Uplander—the minivan with the lowest owner satisfaction rating of any vehicle in our annual survey.

Curiously, this is not the first time I've been so honored. The GMC Jimmy was a popular rebadging of the Chevy Blazer SUV back in the '90s. I could go out and buy a Jimmy and a Traverse and have a garage full of namesakes if I could find a Jimmy still on the road. But then again, it's bad enough having my last name spelled wrong. Nobody gets away with calling me Jimmy.

What really bothers me is people have been spelling my name Traverse since at least as long as I've been able to notice. Given the expected popularity of this latest Chevy, I suspect that situation will get only worse. One of our own engineers has already adopted the spelling when addressing me. The only way things might improve is if car enthusiasts rally for the Travers cause and remove the silent E from the end, much like Toyota truck owners removing the "ota" decals from their tailgates.

So thanks again, GM. But honestly, you shouldn't have. Couldn't you have gone with Bivouac? Or Suburbanite?

Dear reader, what about you? Is there a vehicle you'd like named after you? Post your suggestions in the comments below.

Jim Travers

January 30, 2008

From the logbook: Chevrolet Malibu

2008chevroletmalibuext There's no question that General Motors' goal was to make the redesigned Chevrolet Malibu's styling more modern and appealing. Chevrolet has gone as far as poking fun of past Malibu styling in its commercials. One even has police officers failing to see a bank robber's getaway car that they've surrounded. (The ad shows an Oldsmobile Cutlass, which was a twin to the concurrent Malibu.)

But focusing on the Malibu's styling, or its past popularity in rental car fleets, is missing the point. The last two generations of the Malibu (introduced in 1997 and 2004, respectively) were decent, practical cars even though they lacked the refinement and performance of class-leaders like the Honda Accord or Toyota Camry. This time around, the Malibu aims higher to better compete with those family sedan juggernauts. The '08 Malibu has already won a stack of awards, being named to several Top-10 or "Best" lists by enthusiast magazines.

What do we think? We're finishing up our test of the two Malibus we bought: a LT four-cylinder and a loaded LTZ V6. Let's flip through the logbooks for an early look:

"Wow. Impressive to drive, even in the four-cylinder version."

"Best normally-aspirated Ecotec (four-cylinder engine) application out there - reasonably quiet most of the time."

"Decent enough seats, but hard to reach seat levers and manual recline sucks [on our LT]."

"Low levels of interior noise for class."

"I would be completely happy with this four-cylinder; plenty of power even for merging and passing."

"My greatest complaint is that I really liked the visibility of the squarer previous version."

"Chrome accents shine distractingly on the windshield."

"Finally a domestic four-cylinder that doesn't sound bad."

"[The LT's] handling seems a step better than the [V6] LTZ, with a lighter, more agile feel."

"Great [V6] powertrain."

"I'm disappointed with the low shoulder belt anchor, poorly placed seat heater switch, and lack of a shifter indicator in the dash. The good news: taut handling; excellent controls; nicely styled exterior and interior (rare in any car); great driving position and seat comfort; roomy rear seat; and loaded with features."

"Distinctive dashboard - definitely not a 'me-too' design."

"I like the terracotta-colored interior [in our LTZ]."

"I do not like the interior trim. The dash has a pink tone to it, whereas the other browns are more orange."   

"This is a heavy hitter that competes head-on with Camry, Accord, and Altima."

"Really no reason for GM to build the G6, Aura, Impala, or LaCrosse anymore - just sell these instead."

2008chevroletmalibuinter_2 So, while our engineers and wanna-be interior designers debate over our Malibu LTZ's "brick"-colored interior, consensus seems to be that the car is shaping up to be very competitive where it really counts. Although the Malibu came out too late for a head-to-head comparison with the redesigned 2008 Honda Accord, we'll have a full test of it in the March issue, as well as posted online soon.

Tom Mutchler

January 22, 2008

Detroit auto show - Personal picks

The Cars team reflects on the 2008 Detroit auto show, selecting their personal picks for the most memorable, significant, or simply favorite cars at the event.

2009_audi_r8_v12diesel Audi R8 V12 TDI:
Last week, I gushed over the brilliant Audi R8 V12 TDI concept (see blog). The intoxication of it has stuck with me like a bad cold...I can't seem to shake it. The look is mean. The headlights squint at you like Clint Eastwood. The engine looks like it should be in a museum of modern art. And while Audi also had a "standard" R8 on display, it was one of only a few cars people were waiting in line to sit in. This car could reside in my garage forever.—Mike Quincy

Hummer_hxdetroitshow Chevrolet Corvette ZR1/Hummer HX:
These pure vehicles push American icons to new reaches. The ZR1 is history in the making. It is an amazing performance machine that will fuel my automotive fantasies for quite some time, and is certain to be chronicled for generations to come. The Hummer HX represents the long-rumored H4, a Jeep Wrangler alternative intended to provide an attainable entry to the off-roading brand, and, now it may also represent a potential production savior for a brand that has become the pariah of the Green movement. Make it affordable, with a traditional square back and a thrifty diesel, and watch the Hummer "jamborees" flourish. Granted, the Corvette and Hummer are quite  different vehicles, but each represents extreme fun, and who doesn't want more of that?—Jeff Bartlett

Fiskerkarmahybridblue Fisker Karma:
Designed by custom car designer Henrik Fisker (who also penned the BMW Z8, one of my favorite cars ever), the Fisker shows that hybrids -- even futuristic advanced plug-in hybrids that will run all day on electricity -- aren't just for environmentalist ninnies. It looks great and reportedly goes fast. (A top speed of 125 mph and 0-60 mph in less than 6 seconds are as fast as any mere mortal should need to go on land.) In short, it should give even the most jaded car enthusiasts an environmentally friendly hybrid they can lust after.

In terms of affordability, however, I've got to name the Honda CR-Z as my runner up. It marries hybrid efficiency to sports-car fun just like the Fisker. It isn't as advanced, and it is limited by being a two-seater. But it has the fun-to-drive element sorely lacking in Honda's last mileage champ, the Insight. And best of all, most car shoppers should be able to afford it.—Eric Evarts

Cadillacctscoupeside Jeep Renegade/Cadillac CTS coupe:
This was my 15th time attending the Detroit auto show and, overall, it was a relatively boring event. There were no outrageous introductions such as a Chrysler minivan landing on stage, no retro chic surprises like the Volkswagen New Beetle, or first-time viewings of highly anticipated significant vehicles.

That said, I'd have to go with styling features that caught my eye. The Jeep Renegade concept, for example, was eye candy that I hope someday becomes a modern beach buggy. Forget the electric drive. Cash-strapped Chrysler is busy enough trying to survive. Not to mention the paradox of"go anywhere" marketing and getting stuck with an empty battery. A much more realistic and closer to production styling statement was the Cadillac CTS coupe. Even though I'm not much of a coupe fan, it looked spectacular.—Gabe Shenhar

Hondacrzfdetroitshow Honda CR-Z:
I really liked the Honda CR-Z. With styling that is a dead-ringer for the old (and beloved CRX), the CR-Z's possible hybrid powertrain looks to vault this little runabout to the top of the fuel economy mountain... just like the original CRX. Honda is also disciplined at keeping weight low and suspension tuning interesting, so I imagine driving one will be a ball. Let's hope it's affordable.—David Champion

2009_toyota_venzadetroitshow Toyota Venza:
Over the course of the show I was consistently drawn back to one car: the Toyota Venza. But not because I'm wowed by its styling, price, powerplant, or features. It's because I have no idea where it will fit in the Toyota lineup. Between the RAV4, Highlander, Avalon, and even the base Sienna, how many 5-passenger people movers are needed from one manufacturer? This odd vehicle certainly drew my attention each day... and the resulting quizzical stares as I tried to determine its niche.—Jon Linkov

Also read Cliff Weathers' pick for best in show.

See our complete coverage of the 2008 Detroit auto show. And discuss the event in our auto show forum. 

                                                                                                           

January 21, 2008

Detroit - My "Best of Show" pick

When the judges select the "Best of Show" at the Westminster Kennel Club, they don't choose the dog that has the best disposition, the nicest looks, or the one that's most exotic. The judges thoroughly inspect these dogs and select the one that best represents its pedigree. I'm taking a similar approach for my reflections on the Detroit auto show.

I'm immediately disqualifying any far-out concept vehicle, as they're mostly cartoonish takes on where automotive breeding may (or may not) be going.

I'm also disqualifying the entire crossover category, as I believe that the class is still made up of mutts. It's not that they're bad vehicles as a group, it's that their mission is still very ill defined; one man's crossover is another man's SUV and/or another man's wagon. Moreover, what defines a crossover today is very different from what one was five years ago; I have a hard time focusing on a moving target.

And as a rule, I'm disqualifying any so-called family vehicles with outrageously high belt lines, tiny greenhouses, and swoopy designs that compromise access, and impair the driver's visibility. I think it is a shame when automakers think it's just fine to compromise a family's vehicle access and safety for the sake of fashion; they're making vehicles for trips to lacrosse matches, big-box stores, and theme parks.

Chevroletcorvettezr1trac My choice is be a vehicle that has stuck close to its original mission: a vehicle faithful to its lineage, but absolutely created for today. Moreover, it's a vehicle that the privileged among us may one day appreciate driving. That car is...the 2009 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1. It's a take-no-prisoners sports car that has all the outrageousness and excitement of its 1990s ancestor, and then some. (True, the last Corvette we tested, a 2006 Z06, wasn't exactly easy to get in and out of, nor did it score points for excellent visibility, but I'm more forgiving of these downfalls in a pure-bred sports car than I am a family-oriented crossover.)

The original ZR-1 (note there is no dash with the new moniker) featured the innovative LT5 V8 engine that provided 375 (and later 405) hp. Its convex hindquarters, wide tires, and square-ish taillights set it apart from other Corvettes, although the distinction faded as the LT1 Corvette was updated over time. .

The 2009 ZR1 makes a similar performance advance, though wrapped in more dramatic bodywork. It features a supercharged 6.2-liter V8 engine that GM says is capable of producing at least 620 hp and nearly 600 pounds-feet of torque. (Yes, you read the last sentence correctly). And in keeping with the tradition of outlandish design treatments: Carbon-fiber body parts include wider fenders, the hood, roof, parts of the front fascia, and rocker panels. And as a crowning touch, the hood window strikingly showcases the omnipotent LS9 engine.

So what if this monster is genetically enhanced? I think the ZR1 would make Zora Arkus-Duntov, the late "Father of the Corvette" who changed the car from a docile roadster to the legendary sports car it is, very proud. 

Look for more staff selections on their personal picks from the Detroit auto show in the blog soon.

Cliff Weathers

See our complete coverage of the 2008 Detroit auto show. And discuss the event in our auto show forum. 

December 25, 2007

A few of our favorite things

As the end of the year draws near, we have been talking around the offices about our dream automotive gifts, from improbable crate-engine transplants to benchmark production cars. The team who attended the annual Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA) show last month was eager to share their personal picks from this massive Las Vegas event, with a decided classic-car bent. So we present a few of our favorite things... from SEMA.

Semayenkocamaro Jim Travers: If you missed your chance to snap up a Yenko Stinger Camaro back when they were available to Nehru-jacketed customers in 1969, you've got another chance. Classic Automotive Restoration Specialists of Belews Creek, N.C., will be happy to build you a brand-new one. Using a new body shell from Dynacorn, a crate 427 motor from General Motors, and suspension, interior, trim and pieces from other suppliers, the Stinger Camaro shown at the 2007 SEMA show is accurate right down to the Yenko striping.

For those of you too young to remember, Don Yenko was the son of a Pennsylvania Chevrolet dealer who started a little cottage industry in the 1960s modifying Chevys for more performance and distributing them through a network of dealers in the Northeast. His Camaros got a 427-cubic inch V8 engine in place of the biggest powerplant offered in the Camaro at the time, a 396. Yenko also made suspension and cosmetic modifications, and, with very few built, his cars remain some of the most sought-after by Camaro collectors today.

Classic Automotive Restoration will even update the car if you like, keeping the look but adding a greater measure of safety and drivability with options like four-wheel disc brakes and independent suspension. The cost? The Hugger Orange model displayed at SEMA was priced at $125,000. That may seem like a considerable chunk of change for a brand new old car, but consider this: Vintage car pricing guide Cars That Matter shows a 1969 original Yenko Camaro in excellent condition could fetch about $399,000 today. Try getting that for your Nehru jacket.   

Semahondaodyssey Tom Mutchler: You can take Tom to SEMA, but you can't quite take the minivan out of Tom. Way in the corner of Honda's SEMA stand sat a Honda Odyssey. This isn't any Odyssey though; it competed in the One Lap of America race. With a gutted interior, this Odyssey packs a turbocharged V6 with 400 horsepower at the wheels mated to a six-speed manual borrowed from an Acura TL Type-S. Forget rear video screens, heated seats, and "Lazy Susan" under-floor storage compartments. This hot-rod Odyssey had two racing seats with race harnesses, no air bags - and no dashboard, with just a racing digital display. (For some reason, the DVD drive remains.)  Sure, the One Lap Odyssey is a bit extreme, even for me, but it gets me thinking about an Odyssey with an Acura RL AWD drivetrain underneath...

My other pick is something completely different: a Volvo-based street rod. The Caresto V8 Speedster has a rear-mounted Volvo V8, Volvo's egg crate grille, and an aluminum and carbon-fiber body. Beautifully rendered, it updates a classic form (and I'm a sucker for the deep copper brown Scottish leather seats).

Sema65mustangdrake Bob Huerster: My favorite car among hundreds at the massive SEMA show was a humble 1965 Ford Mustang that appeals to me as much for the automobile as the story behind it. This Mustang revived a lot of fond memories. I recall being taken by the car's styling when it first came out. It was amazing how many of them quickly appeared in my neighborhood where my friend and I used to sit on the front porch of my house and count them as they went by. As sales grew, even two of my sisters bought a blue convertible and a red hard top.

This pristine example belonged to the wife of a former high-school drafting teacher of Scott Drake, a budding car enthusiast who went on to start a company that sells parts for Mustangs. This Mustang deteriorated badly over the years, and Drake decided to restore it as a gesture of gratitude to his former teacher, who he said helped shape the attitudes that lead to his success in business. A heart-warming story and a job well done, both recall the introduction of an American classic and fuel for my own automotive passion that still burns strong today.

We're interested to hear what automotive gifts you would most like to receive. Post in the Comments below.

Happy holidays!

The CR Cars blog team.

November 16, 2007

GM green democracy - the Beat goes on

Gmmicrocarsbeatgroove At a show known for dedication to environmental issues, Los Angeles hosted a litany of “Greener than thou” executive speeches that could even wear down the most devote solar-powered, Earth Day supporter. Many manufacturers had legitimate claims, rolling out intriguing technologies and models. Others made references to token accomplishments and promised to monitor market trends, while seeming to miss an entire inconvenient cultural and economic movement.

General Motors came out as the Jolly Green Giant, dedicating its corporate press conference to trumpeting its myriad green accomplishments and near-future plans. All good stuff, really. On its large stage, GM rolled out a series of new hybrid models, such as the Chevrolet Malibu, Silverado, and Volt concept. There’s no denying, GM is on a mission, and it includes the bold intent of making the Chevrolet brand the industry leader for fuel economy.

The ever-quotable Bob Lutz, GM Vice Chairman, Global Product Development, was the master of ceremonies, making such pronouncements as “There is no 100-mile-per-gallon carburetor...or other secret solution...that will solve all our energy and environmental problems overnight.”

Gmtripletvoteresults In the green spirit, Lutz brought up the Chevrolet triplets, a trio of thrifty, micro-car concepts unveiled at the New York auto show. These vehicles represented great promise for direct customer feedback on their production potential. For all the auto show hoopla, in the end the manufacturers seek to influence and interpret public opinion. In the case of the triplets, consumers were invited to vote on their favorite model online. As of the press conference, 1.9 million votes had been tallied, with the Beat (green) leading by a strong margin.

Lutz’s scripted comment was, “And I'm glad to announce that the Beat gets our vote too...and we'll be building a car based on the Beat in the near future...at our Korean production facilities. It just so happens that this is the one we wanted to build from the beginning...so it's great to see the voting line-up with our thinking.”

It seemed like a casual aside, one that got a hearty laugh from the audience. However true the statement may be—and I do see the value in market validation—it saddens me that the peoples’ voice was diminished to an echo. In a later side conversation, one GM staffer mentioned voting 10 times.

This was a good week in LA for GM, made stronger by the Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid winning the 2008 Green Car of the Year honors. However, in the end it felt to me like a bad moment for democracy.

Jeff Bartlett

November 01, 2007

SEMA - Chevrolet HHR Panel SS

SEMA is a place where car manufacturers can show off. Amid the hundreds of souped-up vehicles, there are a few production-portending cars, such as the Chevrolet HHR Panel SS, along with the Cobalt SS. Officially labeled a concept, this HHR gives a good view of an upcoming special-edition model.

Semachevyhhrss_2 Still sporting its throwback style, the HHR enhances that look with distinct front and rear fascias, rocker panels, front grille, and rear spoiler. Beneath the hood is a turbocharged, 2.0-liter, four-cylinder engine producing 260-hp. It's matched to an automatic transmission. The FE5 Sport suspension includes specific stabilizer bars, spring rates, and damper tuning. In SEMA fashion, this concept version suspension has been modified to accommodate 20-inch wheels and tires. Stability control will be standard on the production model, as well as four-wheel disc brakes with ABS.

Although the HHR scored well enough in our tests to be recommended, it certainly had its faults, including limited outward visibility, controls that were confusing and hard to see, and a large turning circle.  Also, since the HHR we tested felt lethargic in everyday driving because of the tall gearing and the slow responding transmission, we look forward to checking out this high-performance version of the HHR scheduled for the 2009 model year.

--Liza Barth

Discuss SEMA and the HHR in our Auto Show and Chevrolet forums.

October 31, 2007

SEMA - Diesel diaries

The halls of SEMA have long featured aftermarket suppliers who make components to modify pickup truck diesel engines. Here, you can find parts to get more power out of your Cummins, Duramax, or Power Stroke, or even find wiring harnesses that allow you to slip that big Cummins inline six into a street rod.

Chevysuburbandieselsema But what caught my eye was a concept Suburban HD on the GM stand. (The Suburban looks pretty neat with the heavy-duty front end grafted on.) According to the handy information chart nearby, this Suburban has a 4.5-liter diesel producing 310 hp and 520 pound-feet of torque. This may be a sneak peek at the rumored diesel that will start showing up in light-duty GM trucks in the next year or two. (That said, I'd rather have the current "full-size" Duramax diesel in a large heavy-duty Suburban.)

This brings to mind what another journalist said to me this the morning here in Vegas. Pickup truck buyers already have the choice between a dizzying array of engines, axle ratios, and body styles. Soon you'll be able to add a hybrid engine and a diesel engine to that mix -- all in a light-duty truck, adding up to a lot of decisions for a consumer. We'll see what sifts out over the long haul though, given that both hybrids and diesels are relatively costly to build and both represent different means to a similar end.

Toyota showed a Tundra dualie with a Hino 8-liter diesel engine under the hood. Toyota and Nissan have both toyed with the idea of heavy-duty versions of their Tundra and Titan, respectively, but production versions of those seem more off than on right now. Regardless, the placard next to the concept said that the engine usually pulls around a 35,000-pound truck. (Trust me, this truck doesn't weigh that much.) I saw at least one showgoer track down a Toyota rep, begging them to build it, and overheard another aftermarket diesel modifier who was looking foward to getting even more power from such a beast. SEMA is the land of extremes, but you never know...

While making the rounds this morning, a dramatically different Chevy caught my eye. At the Bassani Xhaust booth sat a 1970 Chevelle with the 6.6-liter Duramax and its 6-speed Allison automatic transmission stuffed inside, claiming 1000 horsepower. Even more amazing--especially in the super-modified SEMA context--all of that monster motor fits under the stock hood, sans add-on hood scoop. However, no Chevelle diesels have been spotted, yet. Talk about being the torque of the town...

--Tom Mutchler

Discuss SEMA in our Auto Show and Aftermarket forums.

Consumers sign-up to drive fuel-cell cars for free

Chevyequinoxfuelcelldri Last week, General Motors announced the names of first eight consumers in the country who will get to spend three months driving a fuel cell car: five individuals in Orange County, Calif., and three more in Westchester County, New York. Through an online application, GM is allowing other drivers register for a chance to live with a fuel-cell car and provide real-world feedback.

The selected drivers will be part of the largest public demonstration of fuel cell vehicles, which will eventually include 100 fuel-cell powered Chevrolet Equinox SUVs, in Los Angeles, New York, and Washington, D.C. Through this program, General Motors hopes to demonstrate the technology, as well as gain feedback from consumers use  the vehicles in the real world.

Projectdrivewayfuelcellfill The three cities were chosen because they have the only publicly accessible hydrogen fuel pumps that can fill the fuel-cell powered Chevrolet Equinoxes. So far there is only one hydrogen station in each of the three cities capable of filling the fuel-cell Equinox. The GM system requires hydrogen gas compressed to 10,000 psi--twice the pressure other, more common hydrogen pumps can handle. The Equinoxes can go about 150 miles on a tank when filled to 10,000 psi, and hold 4.2 kg of compressed hydrogen. GM says it takes 5-6 minutes to fill the tank. They could fill up at 5,000-psi pumps, but would have only a short range. So far no other hydrogen pumps are open to the general public. The company will pay for the fuel and insurance for all consumers chosen to be in the test.

To qualify, consumers have to fill out an online survey. But that doesn't guarantee access to one of the fuel-cell cars. Depending on their answers to the survey, some consumers may be invited to join a GM-sponsored online chat room to discuss hydrogen and fuel cell cars. The company monitors and participates in the chat room, and invites some users to spend up to three months driving the cars, based on their background, driving habits, and forum comments.

The most important qualifications are where you live or work, how long your commute is, and how far you usually drive. But beyond that, GM is interested in finding effective evangelists for fuel-cell cars, as much as anything else. That's because the company feels that the hydrogen refueling infrastructure has fallen behind the development of fuel-cell cars.

GM executives think even the word "hydrogen" has perhaps been stigmatized by images of the Hindenburg zeppelin burning in 1937. Today, the first question many people ask when hearing about hydrogen is whether it is safe.

Hydrogen storage has come a long way since the Hindenburg. In the Equinox, for example, hydrogen is stored in three thick-walled, carbon-fiber tanks whose development included tests in fires, severe vibration, being dropped, and even ballistic tests.

In the end, hydrogen may be far safer than gasoline, in part because it rises and dissipates quickly in the air, so it can't pool under the vehicle. "Gasoline is not the safest fuel, and if it were being introduced in the market for the first time today, it might not make it," says Keith Wipke, an engineer at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colorado.

GM is looking for drivers who are enthusiastic about new technology and protecting the environment, and for opinion leaders who will be enthusiastic advocates of the technology to their friends and families. These drivers are expected to provide feedback on driving the cars (how they handle, how drivers like the brakes, etc.), fueling them, and what less-obvious insights come from truly living with them.

I drove one of the cars, and it feels remarkably well developed for a demonstration vehicle, with strong mid-range acceleration and the standard features of a conventional Equinox. The hydrogen tanks take up only a small portion of the cargo area. The electric regenerative brakes on this model were a little difficult to modulate. But other than that, and the hushed sound of the electric motor, and the KW gauge in place of a tachometer it's hard to distinguish it from a conventional car from behind the wheel.

The future sounds promising for fuel cell cars, but there are still lots of hurdles to be surmounted. For more detail on fuel-cell cars visit our Fuel Economy Guide.

If you'd like to participate, and you live in Orange County, Calif. or Westchester County, N.Y., visit the Project Driveway site.

- Eric Evarts

Discuss fuel-cell vehicles in the "Hybrids and alternative fuel vehicles" forum.

October 30, 2007

SEMA - 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt SS

General Motors has 28 vehicles on display at the Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA) show in Las Vegas, spanning from mildly modified to true fantasy machines. Amidst all the chromed flash is a production model heading to Chevrolet dealers next year: the Cobalt SS is making a comeback.

Chevrolet_cobalt_ssengine Developed by GM's Performance Division, the Cobalt SS is powered by a turbocharged, 260-hp, 2.0-liter, four-cylinder engine. While the 5-speed manual transmission carries over (no 6-speed), it gets a 55 horsepower boost to 260. The SS has chassis enhancements similar to the Chevrolet HHR SS, but with larger Brembo brakes. It is fitted with a new FE5 sport suspension with specific stabilizer bars, spring rates, and damper tuning. GM boasts a 0-60 mph acceleration time of approximately 5.7 seconds, aided by the manual transmission's "no-lift shift" feature, which allows quick shifts without lifting the throttle. Our tested, supercharged 2005 Cobalt SS reached 60 mph in 7.3 seconds.

Chevrolet_cobalt_ssThe exterior is dressed with a front fascia with an SS-specific grille, along with unique side trim and optional rear wing. The combined effect is rather mild, especially in Vegas context, compared against its claimed performance capabilities.

Safety features include standard ABS, electronic stability control, and side-impact air bags. Head-protecting curtain air bags are also standard on all Cobalts.

The Cobalt will go on sale in the second quarter of 2008. A sedan version will follow a few months later. We enjoyed driving the previous SS, and are happy that while this model "happened" in Vegas, it won't stay in Vegas.

--Liza Barth

October 19, 2007

From the logbook: Chevrolet Silverado

2007chevysilveradoconsumer The GM full-sized pickup trucks among the best-selling vehicles in the United States year after year, with a large contingent of loyal and prospective buyers. In our latest pickup truck comparison test, the redesigned Silverado did quite well, finishing only four points behind the new Toyota Tundra. Both trucks trail the top-scoring Chevrolet Avalanche, tested previously. We now have sufficient reliability data to recommend the Silverado 1500 and 2500. (Learn more about our latest Reliability findings.)

Silverado_rear_parkinglot However, because we don't recommend models with below-average reliability, the four-wheel-drive V8 Tundra no longer makes Consumer Reports' recommended list. (The two-wheel drive Tundra tops the list for full-sized pickups.)

With the publishing of the September road test, our formal testing and rating of the Silverado is complete, but we thought you might like a candid look at the CR auto engineer's logbook notes:

"The ride is a bit softer than the Ford [F-150] but has some structural jiggles."

"Much better steering and brake feel than before."

"...spunky powertrain and reasonably good ride and handling."

"Two of my biggest complaints about [past] Chevy trucks seem to be addressed here: light steering and a spongy brake pedal. Though not heavy, the steering is more direct and linear, and the brake has a firm feel."

"Access to the front seat is difficult [for shorter people]. Needs running boards or grab handles."

"First truck I drove this week (Ram, Tundra, Silverado) that has adequate lumbar support. Still hate the manual recline..."

"Truck bed height is good for loading."

"Handled 800 pounds of roofing material without wincing."

"Still cheap interior and hard-to-find door latch."

"Tiny climate control buttons."

"$37K seems like a lot of cash when you realize that you're not getting heated leather seats, adjustable pedals or a premium audio system. Where did the money go to? Everything looked better in the John Mellencamp ads..."

"More rattles than the first time I drove it...sounds like the whole back seat is falling apart."

"Most civilized truck of the bunch."

"Friendliest truck of the group...none of the others is as handy as a daily commuter and weekend warrior."

As you can see, we quite like the Silverado, although the team still has some criticisms.

--Mike Quincy

Discuss the Silverado and other pickup trucks in the Cars forums.

October 10, 2007

Malibu insider: The General wears Prada

Prada_jeans_w_malibu "Iconic" is one of those corporate-speak buzzwords enjoying its 15 minutes of fame, and while not as annoying as "robust," it's starting to bug me. But where robust is just getting tossed around to describe everything from bran flakes to sweat socks, iconic has taken on a deeper, more disturbing meaning with industry's talking heads. It seems like when someone from the car biz uses the "i" word to describe a design these days, what they really mean is they're reaching back to the glory days when their products still resonated with customers.

2008_chevy_malibu_interior General Motors interior design chief Dave Lyon is a stylish guy. He knows an icon when he sees one, and he takes his interiors seriously. Dressed in Prada jeans, he recently addressed a group of less-nattily turned out automotive journalists to talk about the new Chevrolet Malibu's interior. During the presentation, the "i" word came up more than once as Dave showed images of dashboards from Chevy's past said to have inspired the look of the Malibu. All were from the 1950s and early '60s. Not surprisingly, there were no examples from the '70s and '80s, when GM was busily turning out forgettable cars--many of which, fortunately, rusted off the road before they could be remembered by a lot of folks. Those were the days when the General really got serious about giving away the store and its customers to ever-increasingly competitive imports.

But GM is smartening up, as evidenced by models like the well-executed Outlook/Acadia/Enclave SUVs, and new Cadillac CTS. They look good inside and out. The Malibu interior looks and feels vastly improved over previous models, at least in the pre-production model Dave brought to show. Materials are better as is fit and finish.

The new Malibu is obviously an important model for GM; one exec described it as being possibly the most important launch in the company's history. He could be right. Winning over a generation of customers raised in Hondas and Toyotas won't be easy. We haven't had a chance to drive the Malibu yet, but it may be a family sedan with promise.            

Whether it ever rates iconic status remains to be seen.

--Jim Travers

September 26, 2007

UAW GM strike ends with agreement

General Motors and the United Auto Workers (UAW) reached a tentative agreement on a new national labor contract at 3:05 a.m. today, ending the much publicized strike.

More than 70,000 UAW members nationwide walked off their posts at General Motors on Monday morning, after negotiations between the two organizations failed to reach a labor agreement. The UAW contract had expired on September 14th.

The tentative agreement includes provisions for creating an independent retiree health care trust that would assume a reported $50 billion in obligations, according to the Detroit News. With initial funding from GM, the voluntary employees' beneficiary association (VEBA) would reportedly be able to provide retiree health benefits for an estimated 80 years. In the process, it would remove the significant financial burden from GM.

GM agreed to hire 4,100 currently temporary workers, though at their lower wage and with a different benefits package than previous permanent workers.

There are other aspects, such as sign-on bonuses for new hires and scheduled pay increases, that have been variously reported, though there is no official release at this time.

Ultimately, the agreement is not final until it is ratified, approved by the courts, and reviewed by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The UAW expects the terms negotiated with GM to set the tone for discussions with Chrysler Group and Ford Motor Company, according to Automotive News.

The national UAW contract with both Chrysler and Ford also expired mid September.

We expect that the short strike will have a very limited impact on consumers. It's unclear, though, whether or not GM will benefit from this agreement. Time will tell if both sides made the right decisions.

--Jeff Bartlett

September 24, 2007

UAW Strikes GM

More than 70,000 United Auto Workers (UAW) nationwide walked off their posts at General Motors at 11 a.m. this morning, after negotiations between the two organizations failed to reach a labor agreement. Contract talks had officially begun July 23rd.

At issue, GM is looking to make significant cost reductions to remain competitive, even solvent. Some proposed cuts require concessions from the UAW, which seeks to protect job security and benefits for its workers.

The UAW this morning declared its strike intentions, including the following statement:

"We're shocked and disappointed that General Motors has failed to recognize and appreciate what our membership has contributed during the past four years," said UAW President Ron Gettelfinger. "Since 2003 our members have made extraordinary efforts every time the company came to us with a problem: the corporate restructuring, the attrition plan, the Delphi bankruptcy, the 2005 health care agreement. In every case, our members went the extra mile to find reasonable solutions."

Likewise, General Motors issued the following press release:

We are disappointed in the UAW's decision to call a national strike.

The bargaining involves complex, difficult issues that affect the job security of our U.S. work force and the long-term viability of the company. We are fully committed to working with the UAW to develop solutions together to address the competitive challenges facing General Motors.

We will continue focusing our efforts on reaching an agreement as soon as possible.

Saturn_outlook_employees The labor dispute comes at a time when GM is showing positive signs while facing increasingly tough competition. Many of the latest products we have sampled have been competitive (excluding the Pontiac Solstice and Saturn Sky), and in some cases, stand with the best in the class. The Saturn Outlook for example, provides an excellent alternative to a large, truck-based SUV for buyers who don't need the extra towing capacity or off-road ability of a truck. (General Motors/John F. Martin photo shows employees with Outlook at the Lansing Delta Township manufacturing facility.) The Chevrolet Avalanche is our top-rated pickup truck, and the related Chevrolet Silverado also scored well. Further, some future models, such as the redesigned Cadillac CTS and Chevrolet Malibu show promise.

Should this strike linger, it could cause GM to stumble, losing what momentum it has gained during the recent reorganizations and cost-cutting measures. What it means for consumers is hard to predict. Short term, there may be fewer incentives due to dwindling dealer inventory. Products such as the Outlook, GMC Acadia and Buick Enclave are already in short supply. Long term, both car shoppers and investors may see their confidence erode, which would reflect back on GM's finances. Time will tell.

UAW contracts with Chrysler Group and Ford Motor Company also expired on September 14th. Therefore, the results of the current negotiations with GM may have impact for all three automakers and their customers.

--Jeff Bartlett

September 21, 2007

200,000-Mile Club continues to accelerate

October_200k_cover Interest in our October 2007 cover story, “Make your car last 200,000 miles,” has caused high-mileage drivers to log on and share their experiences, advice, and even photos.

The owners’ tales are quite inspiring, with drivers like Martin Sorin claiming that they still have many miles left in their car. As you’ll read below, Martin’s Camry has been to 200,000 miles--twice.

Do you have a story or advice to share? Join the unofficial club! Share your experience in the 200,000-Mile Club forum, and if you’d like to show off your well-traveled ride, you can post a photo at the 200,000-Mile Club photo gallery. Please be sure to include the year, make, model, and mileage when you submit your image.

In the meantime, below are some of our favorite posts.

--Jim Travers


We purchased a 1993 Mercury Villager in July 1993 new. We still drive the car daily and it now has 374,900 miles on the odometer. Original engine with only minor engine work… I think the reason we have had such good luck with this car is by keeping it maintained regularly and not doing much short trip or city driving. We live in a rural area and most trips are at least 20 miles or more.

--David Richards


I think one significant factor in longevity is service and an honest and reliable shop. I could not own a 1990 Volvo 740 GL wagon with 245,000 miles on it in this medium-sized city in Canada without my service technician who owns a shop that specializes in Volvos and VWs.

--Ted Whipp


I have owned this truck since new and have meticulous maintenance records. There have been no internal engine or transmission problems. Take care of all the regular maintenance and you will be rewarded. I have set my new goal at 400,000 miles and fully expect to make it in spite of Michigan roads and weather.

--Jerry Hooker, 1993 Chevrolet S-10, 300,000 miles


I change my oil every 10,000 miles and I change my transmission fluid every 30,000 to 35,000 miles. Another tip is to order or purchase a vehicle with an engine oil cooler and a transmission oil cooler if possible. I have heard and believe that most engine and transmission problems are the result of heat.

--Michael Freeman, 1995 GMC K1500 pickup, 429,781 miles


My 1994 Toyota Camry V-6 wagon currently has 416,200 miles on it and is still running strong. I hope to reach 500,000 miles with it. I agree with your article about fixing things as soon as they need it, buying a reliable car, and doing scheduled maintenance when the owner's manual says to do it.

--Martin Sorin

September 07, 2007

Personal Picks: Pickup trucks, part 2

Ford_f250_super_duty For the September pickup truck test, we decided to put a different spin on the monthly "Personal Picks." Instead of probing the minds of our engineers and editors, we went directly to the people who use trucks on a day-to-day basis: the maintenance staff of Consumer Reports' auto test facility.

Here is the last of the pickup truck picks from our hard-working crew:

Erik Dill:
Half-ton pick: Chevrolet Silverado

I found it difficult to pick one, and I especially had a hard time deciding between the Toyota Tundra and the Chevrolet Silverado. Both trucks performed very well and were comfortable and easy to drive. I guess it comes down to style. So, my pick goes to the Silverado, which I preferred head and shoulders above the Toyota. Payload in a half-ton truck is not a feature that I rank high, simply because I've owned them and don't expect much. I look at these vehicles as an alternative to an enclosed SUV with a restrictive cargo area -- an overdeveloped "grocery getter," if you will. If I was going to "work" a truck, this group would not be my first choice, unless "working" meant going to Home Depot for a couple of pieces of lumber with the family.

Three-quarter ton pick: Chevrolet Silverado
Now the three-quarter-ton diesel trucks are a different animal. Of the three, again, I chose the Chevy. I evaluated each truck on fairly equal ground, having "worked" each one. All the heavy-duty trucks are able enough, and each impressed me with their payload and towing ability. The power, especially, was mind blowing since I was comparing them to the gas-powered 1-ton truck I currently drive. In this group, my final decision came down to the drivetrains, comfort, and cab layout. That being said, I wouldn't trade the Silverado's Duramax/Allison combo for anything. The Chevy's seating was more supportive for me and the control layout was familiar. One of strengths of the Dodge was its engine brake; this should be a standard feature on all makes. It was actually addicting and I missed not having it while trailering with the others. I also liked the extendable mirrors from the Ford. If I had a major complaint for the Silverado, it would be the ride.

Michael Jascot:
Half-ton pick: Toyota Tundra

If you're only towing occasionally, the half-ton models will suit the need since they're much more geared for comfort and built for more for family use and weekend warriors. My pick in this class is the Toyota Tundra. Toyota's reliability and good looks make this truck a no-brainer. It's very well built and drove and handled great. Its design incorporated the things that I want in a truck for work, daily routines, as well as weekend fun. Ride comfort, handling, cab room, and easily accessible controls made this pick on the top of my list. I was pleased with the Tundra's overall design and available options. Visibility was a nice feature in this truck, and I quickly felt comfortable in the drivers-seat. I would be very happy with this choice for a half-ton pickup.

Three-quarter ton pick: Ford F-250
All the three-quarter-ton trucks seem well built, but I felt most comfortable in the Ford F-250. It had plenty of responsive power and the true feel of a work truck. I especially liked the large telescoping mirrors, which made it very nice for towing, as well as the easy-to-reach brake controller. The stylish and roomy cab is well balanced for both comfort and work; I especially appreciated the ample storage inside. Although it's a large vehicle with a long wheelbase, I was surprised with its good turning radius. I felt visibility was better in the F-250 than the others, making me feel most comfortable in this truck. I was easily accustomed to the drive and handling, and I am confident that this truck would be a good choice for me.

August 21, 2007

Taking the full-sized SUV hybrids to the streets

Not all big SUVs have to get bad gas mileage, according to General Motors. I guess it depends on what you consider bad.

Hybrid_chevrolet_tahoe_front The General is rolling out its latest hybrid system--its first full hybrids--on full-sized three-ton SUVs this fall. The automaker estimates the new Chevrolet Tahoe and GMC Yukon "Two-Mode" hybrid SUV