Test complete: 2010 Mercedes-Benz GLK350

Based on the C-Class sedan, we had high hopes for the Mercedes-Benz GLK. Mercedes sedans have a well-earned reputation for delivering an excellent, composed ride and agile handling. With the standard 3.5-liter V6 and seven-speed transmission, it appeared on the scene as a promising new competitor in the ever-growing luxury small SUV class.

Unfortunately, it doesn’t achieve its potential. The steering isn’t very responsive and the ride suffers from too much side-to-side rocking at low speeds. A cramped rear seat with narrow door openings and a wide expanse of a doorsill compromises utility. The refined powertrain does provide plenty of motivation, but the 18 mpg overall on premium fuel is less than you would get in a much roomier and better mannered Lexus RX350.

Overall, much like some others in this class - it’s difficult to find many reasons to pay the $41,760 sticker in our test car over a loaded Toyota RAV4 V6 or a turbocharged Subaru Forester. Both can be equipped with leather, offer comfortable rides, are more agile to drive, and cost around $10,000 less. Then again, they don’t have the coveted Mercedes Tri-star logo, nor distinctive Lego-block styling and golf-club cachet.

Learn more about the Mercedes-Benz GLK350, with road tests, pricing, and more, in the model overview (available to online subscribers).

—Liza Barth and Jake Fisher

Comments

[coolcar]

Really surprising that Mercedes Benz did not make this vehicle to my expectations and the standards of refinement, performance, and comfort they are known so well for...