Top Product Ratings:  Tires  |  Sedans  |  SUVs  |  Small Cars  |  GPS
| More

June 12, 2007

Driving the fuel-cell cars of tomorrow

Automakers are taking differing approaches to reducing petroleum use, from building cars that run on E85 ethanol, to plug-in hybrid vehicles (short-range electric vehicles with a gas engine for longer trips), to fuel-cell electric vehicles that run on hydrogen produced from natural gas.

We recently had a chance to sample two such fuel-cell vehicles, and talk to their automakers about their approaches to alternative fuel technology. The differences were enlightening.

Honda_fcx_driving_2 In Washington, we drove the next generation Honda FCX, a midsized, four-passenger sedan with a 95 kilowatt (127-horsepower) motor, and a 100 kW fuel-cell. Honda is targeting a 270-mile range on four kilograms of compressed hydrogen, stored in a 5,000 psi tank that takes up much of the trunk.

In suburban New York City, around the corner from our Yonkers offices, we drove General Motors' Sequel fuel-cell SUV--now known as a Chevrolet. The company had just driven two of the vehicles 300 miles from Rochester, New York, on hydrogen produced from renewable sources, the company says. Both Sequels had enough fuel left over for 50 miles more travel.

Gm_sequel_driving_2 The Sequel uses three electric motors to achieve all-wheel-drive, one for the front axle and one on each rear wheel. Combined, they produce 115 kilowatts (154-horsepower), from a fuel cell rated at 73 kW. One key difference between the GM and Honda vehicles is that the Sequel uses three smaller hydrogen tanks pressurized to 10,000 psi. to store 8 kg of hydrogen, giving it the range advantage over the Honda.

After driving both of them, a few conclusions stand out:

  • Although neither manufacturer claimed its prototype was as well-finished as a production car, the FCX seemed ready for production, while the Sequel was more of a fully functional, highway-capable concept vehicle.
  • While GM is pursuing a truly revolutionary vision of future automobile design, Honda is focused on a much nearer-term goal of using fuel cells, and today's imperfect hydrogen production technology, to power cars otherwise similar to those we drive today.
  • Fuel cells are so efficient, that even given the fact that most hydrogen today comes from non-renewable natural gas, it may represent a significant and real energy savings for some cars to use them as an alternative to gasoline. In that light, fuel-cell cars may not be as far away as they once seemed.
  • Since the vision General Motors is pursuing involves so many radical changes to vehicle design as well as to refueling infrastructure, the U.S.-based company is also working hard to develop other technologies, such as flex-fuel cars that can run on ethanol and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in the meantime. Honda is instead focused almost entirely on developing fuel cell cars and the infrastructure needed to run them.

In future blogs, we'll give more detail about each of these points as we examine the road to the hydrogen future.

--Eric Evarts

Comments

Any idea yet when Honda will introduce a diesel engine in either the Pilot or Ridgeline? Thanks.

I read an artical this weekend about "peek oil," where several people believe that the worlds daily oil output is at its' peak. That being the case, as demand increases steadily we likely will find the price continuing to increase with it. One of the experts interviewed believed that liquid amonia was the key to the automotive future. I am not sure how combustable that is, but after reading these FCV articles I can see how amonia could be an excellent fuel source. It contains one nitrogen aton attached to four hydrogen atoms per molecule. So would the end result be nitrogen and water vapor. Two key ingredients to the air we breath now?

Thanks

Peak oil is just a myth, there's no shortage of oil, if anything there's a lack of drilling and exploring for new oil. They won't even let them open up new drilling in alaska where there is plenty of oil. If theres a shortage than why doesn't opec let it's member countries raise output? They're a fricken cartel artificially reducing supply in order to keep prices high, duh!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a Comment

All comments are reviewed by our moderators, and will not appear on this blog unless they have been approved. Comments that do not relate directly to the blog entry's contents, are commercial in nature, contain objectionable or inappropriate material, or otherwise violate our User Agreement or Privacy Policy, will not be approved. Approved posts generally appear within 24 hours of receipt. For general inquiries not related to this blog, please contact Customer Service.

Nobody Tests Like We Do

Our testers put 100s of products through their paces at our National Testing and Research Center. Learn more about how we test for:

  • Performance
  • Safety
  • Reliability